How Distractions Undermine Attentional Synchronisation in Work‐Based Learning: A Randomised Controlled Study Using Dual Mobile Eye‐Tracking

ABSTRACT Background Research in social cognition suggests that learning effectiveness in teacher‐learner pairs may be influenced by how well their attention aligns with each other. However, we currently have limited understanding of how common distractions in real‐world environments affect teacher‐student interactions, specifically the synchronisation of their visual attention. Methods This randomised controlled study investigates the impact of distractions on attentional synchronisation, learning performance, and cognitive load during training. A total of 29 medical students were randomly assigned to either a distraction group or a control group during a Transesophageal Echocardiography training in a simulation OR setting. Distractions were systematically induced in the experimental group, while attentional synchronisation was measured using a novel dual mobile eye‐tracking technology. Results The distraction group demonstrated lower attentional synchronisation, compared to the control group (Mean = 41.59% ± 6.89% [SD] vs. 50.96% ± 10.59%; Bonferroni‐corrected t (27) = −2.84, p = 0.008, Cohen's d = 1.06). This reduction in attentional synchronisation was accompanied by significantly poorer practical and visual performances ( d = 0.87 and 0.62), longer task completion times ( d = 2.05), and higher intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads ( d = 1.09 and 1.04). Conclusions These findings underscore the crucial role of attentional synchronisation in optimising work‐based learning for complex clinical skills. Distractions in the learning environment disrupt the alignment of attention between teacher and learner, which impairs learning outcomes with substantial effect sizes. We outline several practical options to re‐establish attentional synchronisation in distraction‐rich learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70059
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Distractions Undermine Attentional Synchronisation in Work‐Based Learning: A Randomised Controlled Study Using Dual Mobile Eye‐Tracking

Dogus Darici, Lion Sieg, Jan Karsten, Hendrik Eismann et al.
6 citations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
20.67
article

How Distractions Undermine Attentional Synchronisation in Work‐Based Learning: A Randomised Controlled Study Using Dual Mobile Eye‐Tracking

Dogus Darici, Lion Sieg, Jan Karsten, Hendrik Eismann, Bertrand Schneider
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Research in social cognition suggests that learning effectiveness in teacher‐learner pairs may be influenced by how well their attention aligns with each other. However, we currently have limited understanding of how common distractions in real‐world environments affect teacher‐student interactions, specifically the synchronisation of their visual attention. Methods This randomised controlled study investigates the impact of distractions on attentional synchronisation, learning performance, and cognitive load during training. A total of 29 medical students were randomly assigned to either a distraction group or a control group during a Transesophageal Echocardiography training in a simulation OR setting. Distractions were systematically induced in the experimental group, while attentional synchronisation was measured using a novel dual mobile eye‐tracking technology. Results The distraction group demonstrated lower attentional synchronisation, compared to the control group (Mean = 41.59% ± 6.89% [SD] vs. 50.96% ± 10.59%; Bonferroni‐corrected t (27) = −2.84, p = 0.008, Cohen's d = 1.06). This reduction in attentional synchronisation was accompanied by significantly poorer practical and visual performances ( d = 0.87 and 0.62), longer task completion times ( d = 2.05), and higher intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads ( d = 1.09 and 1.04). Conclusions These findings underscore the crucial role of attentional synchronisation in optimising work‐based learning for complex clinical skills. Distractions in the learning environment disrupt the alignment of attention between teacher and learner, which impairs learning outcomes with substantial effect sizes. We outline several practical options to re‐establish attentional synchronisation in distraction‐rich learning environments.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 41(3)
University of Münster (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
20.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.