Results of a multi-perspective examination of loneliness trajectories and its determinants in German adults during the COVID-19 pandemic

Most research on adults' vulnerability to loneliness during the pandemic has been of limited quality. This study aimed to overcome previous limitations by examining loneliness trajectories in German adults from a population-based cohort during the pandemic using face-to-face assessment, identifying risk factors and highlighting those particularly relevant to older adults. Analyses included two measurement points before and two during the pandemic, combining data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study and COVID-19 Study (N = 7001; baseline: M<sub>age</sub> = 51.72, SD<sub>age</sub> = 10.04). Growth mixture models identified distinct loneliness trajectories. Factors associated with these trajectories were tested by a multinomial logistic regression model including sociodemographic, individual, and pandemic-related predictors and interactions with age. Overall, mean loneliness increased. Three distinct classes were identified: No Loneliness (59.3%), Onset (23.3%), and Temporary Increase (17.4%). In comparison to No Loneliness, Onset was associated with reduction in social contact during the pandemic and Temporary Increase with sex, high school degree, pre-pandemic depression symptoms, pandemic-related stressors and social support. No unique risk factors for older adults were found. Interventions that strengthen one's adaptability to (acute) stressors and promote social resources with special attention to women may be a promising way to prevent loneliness during the pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00678-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results of a multi-perspective examination of loneliness trajectories and its determinants in German adults during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mareike Ernst, Denis Gerstorf, Philipp S. Wild, J. König et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
article

Results of a multi-perspective examination of loneliness trajectories and its determinants in German adults during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mareike Ernst, Denis Gerstorf, Philipp S. Wild, J. König, Manfred E. Beutel, Anna C. Reinwarth, Karl J. Lackner, Norbert Pfeiffer, Elmar Brähler, Thomas Münzel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Most research on adults' vulnerability to loneliness during the pandemic has been of limited quality. This study aimed to overcome previous limitations by examining loneliness trajectories in German adults from a population-based cohort during the pandemic using face-to-face assessment, identifying risk factors and highlighting those particularly relevant to older adults. Analyses included two measurement points before and two during the pandemic, combining data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study and COVID-19 Study (N = 7001; baseline: M<sub>age</sub> = 51.72, SD<sub>age</sub> = 10.04). Growth mixture models identified distinct loneliness trajectories. Factors associated with these trajectories were tested by a multinomial logistic regression model including sociodemographic, individual, and pandemic-related predictors and interactions with age. Overall, mean loneliness increased. Three distinct classes were identified: No Loneliness (59.3%), Onset (23.3%), and Temporary Increase (17.4%). In comparison to No Loneliness, Onset was associated with reduction in social contact during the pandemic and Temporary Increase with sex, high school degree, pre-pandemic depression symptoms, pandemic-related stressors and social support. No unique risk factors for older adults were found. Interventions that strengthen one's adaptability to (acute) stressors and promote social resources with special attention to women may be a promising way to prevent loneliness during the pandemic.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Klinikum Klagenfurt (AT), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Institute of Molecular Biology (DE), University of Klagenfurt (AT), Leipzig University (DE)
Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, European Regional Development Fund, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.