Making better clinical decisions: How doctors can recognise and reduce bias and noise in medical practice

Clinical reasoning and decision-making are essential to medical practice, where poor clinical judgement can lead to serious diagnostic errors, suboptimal use of diagnostic tests and investigations, flawed management strategies and ultimately, adverse patient outcomes. It is known that in real-world clinical environments, clinicians often rely on intuitive judgements for decision-making, due to natural proclivities for pattern-recognition and retrieval of pre-existing illness scripts, as well as out of practical necessity to be efficient in fast-paced work environments with high patient volume and cognitive load. Yet, an over-reliance on intuitive judgements can result in cognitive errors. While biases associated with heuristics-based or intuitive thought processes are often discussed in literature, there is also a lesser entity of noise that affects consistency and reliability of clinical decision-making. In this article, we highlight the importance of learning foundational principles of clinical reasoning and understanding how cognitive errors happen in medical training, and suggest a series of educational pedagogies and workplace-based interventions that could help to cultivate and optimise medical decision-making in real-world practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024346
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making better clinical decisions: How doctors can recognise and reduce bias and noise in medical practice

Manjari Lahiri, Tow Keang Lim, Isaac KS Ng, Norshima Nashi et al.
1 citations
Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.52
article

Making better clinical decisions: How doctors can recognise and reduce bias and noise in medical practice

Manjari Lahiri, Tow Keang Lim, Isaac KS Ng, Norshima Nashi, Satya Gollamudi, Wilson G. W. Goh, Daniel J. Morgan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clinical reasoning and decision-making are essential to medical practice, where poor clinical judgement can lead to serious diagnostic errors, suboptimal use of diagnostic tests and investigations, flawed management strategies and ultimately, adverse patient outcomes. It is known that in real-world clinical environments, clinicians often rely on intuitive judgements for decision-making, due to natural proclivities for pattern-recognition and retrieval of pre-existing illness scripts, as well as out of practical necessity to be efficient in fast-paced work environments with high patient volume and cognitive load. Yet, an over-reliance on intuitive judgements can result in cognitive errors. While biases associated with heuristics-based or intuitive thought processes are often discussed in literature, there is also a lesser entity of noise that affects consistency and reliability of clinical decision-making. In this article, we highlight the importance of learning foundational principles of clinical reasoning and understanding how cognitive errors happen in medical training, and suggest a series of educational pedagogies and workplace-based interventions that could help to cultivate and optimise medical decision-making in real-world practice.

Annals of the Academy of Medicine SingaporeVol. 54(5)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), National University of Singapore (SG), National University Hospital (SG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Making better clinical decisions: How doctors can recognise and reduce bias and noise in medical practice — Manjari Lahiri, Tow Keang Lim, et al. · Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS