Timeframe Factors of Door-to-Device Time During Pandemic Situation in a Tertiary Cardiovascular Centre in Indonesia

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly affected every aspect of life, especially in the field of cardiovascular services. This creates many challenges in the treatment of highly time-sensitive and potentially lethal conditions such as ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). STEMI patients at high risk for COVID-19 are recommended to be evaluated with additional testing for COVID-19 and possibly require respiratory support, all of which can delay Door-to-device time (DTDT). Objective: In this study, we sought to determine the DTDT for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute STEMI, the various timeframes influencing the DTDT, and which time factor has the most significant correlation to DTDT in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Methods: A longitudinal retrospective study was conducted at the largest tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia from March 2020 to February 2021. The following timeframes were measured during the study: Door-to-Diagnosis Time [Δt1], Diagnosis-to-Activation Time [Δt2], Informed Consent Time [Δt3], Preparation at Emergency Room (ER) Time [Δt4], Preparation at Catheterization Laboratory Time [Δt6], and PCI Initiation-to-Balloon Time [Δt7]. Spearman’s correlation (ρ) was used to ascertain the correlation among time factors. Results: 238 patients met the inclusion criteria of this study. The observed DTDT was 110 [47 – 437] minutes. Of the variables, DTDT had a strong positive correlation with preparation at the ER time (median 28,0 (1 – 344) minutes; r = 0.702; p-value < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study sheds light on preparation at the ER time as a significant influencing factor for Door-to-device time in the COVID-19 pandemic era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Cardiology
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.1649
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timeframe Factors of Door-to-Device Time During Pandemic Situation in a Tertiary Cardiovascular Centre in Indonesia

Isman Firdaus, Adi Utarini, Dafsah Arifa Juzar, Hanevi Djasri et al.
1 links
Indonesian Journal of Cardiology
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Timeframe Factors of Door-to-Device Time During Pandemic Situation in a Tertiary Cardiovascular Centre in Indonesia

Isman Firdaus, Adi Utarini, Dafsah Arifa Juzar, Hanevi Djasri, Bunga Dewanggi, Syafira Nurfitri
article en

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly affected every aspect of life, especially in the field of cardiovascular services. This creates many challenges in the treatment of highly time-sensitive and potentially lethal conditions such as ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). STEMI patients at high risk for COVID-19 are recommended to be evaluated with additional testing for COVID-19 and possibly require respiratory support, all of which can delay Door-to-device time (DTDT). Objective: In this study, we sought to determine the DTDT for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute STEMI, the various timeframes influencing the DTDT, and which time factor has the most significant correlation to DTDT in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Methods: A longitudinal retrospective study was conducted at the largest tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia from March 2020 to February 2021. The following timeframes were measured during the study: Door-to-Diagnosis Time [Δt1], Diagnosis-to-Activation Time [Δt2], Informed Consent Time [Δt3], Preparation at Emergency Room (ER) Time [Δt4], Preparation at Catheterization Laboratory Time [Δt6], and PCI Initiation-to-Balloon Time [Δt7]. Spearman’s correlation (ρ) was used to ascertain the correlation among time factors. Results: 238 patients met the inclusion criteria of this study. The observed DTDT was 110 [47 – 437] minutes. Of the variables, DTDT had a strong positive correlation with preparation at the ER time (median 28,0 (1 – 344) minutes; r = 0.702; p-value < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study sheds light on preparation at the ER time as a significant influencing factor for Door-to-device time in the COVID-19 pandemic era.

Indonesian Journal of CardiologyVol. 44(4)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), University of Indonesia (ID), Pembuluh Darah Harapan Kita (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.