Incorporating measures of data quality into plant-pollinator databases

The development of large databases of plant-pollinator relationships poses both great opportunities and a particular problem for scientists and practitioners interested in these interactions. A major issue is that it is rare for measures of data quality to be included, in the sense of stating the evidence by which animal X has been determined to be a pollinator of plant Y. Adding such information to databases is vital if we are to fully understand the plant-pollinator relationships that they describe and address information gaps. We present some examples of data quality schemas that have been used in the past and then adopted by the Pollinators of Apocynaceae Database and the Database of Pollinator Interactions (DoPI), and how the forthcoming USDA-NRCS PLANTS database has tackled this question. In addition, we discuss the use of controlled vocabularies developed by the Brazilian Network of Plant-Pollinator Interactions (REBIPP), allied to a vocabulary based on the Darwin Core standard. It is our hope that the pollination ecology community will see the importance of these or other evaluations of data quality and adopt them accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2025)844
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incorporating measures of data quality into plant-pollinator databases

Jorrit H. Poelen, José Augusto Salim, Jeff Ollerton, Débora Pignatari Drucker et al.
2 citations
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Plant and animal studies
6.05
article

Incorporating measures of data quality into plant-pollinator databases

Jorrit H. Poelen, José Augusto Salim, Jeff Ollerton, Débora Pignatari Drucker, Christine Taliga
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The development of large databases of plant-pollinator relationships poses both great opportunities and a particular problem for scientists and practitioners interested in these interactions. A major issue is that it is rare for measures of data quality to be included, in the sense of stating the evidence by which animal X has been determined to be a pollinator of plant Y. Adding such information to databases is vital if we are to fully understand the plant-pollinator relationships that they describe and address information gaps. We present some examples of data quality schemas that have been used in the past and then adopted by the Pollinators of Apocynaceae Database and the Database of Pollinator Interactions (DoPI), and how the forthcoming USDA-NRCS PLANTS database has tackled this question. In addition, we discuss the use of controlled vocabularies developed by the Brazilian Network of Plant-Pollinator Interactions (REBIPP), allied to a vocabulary based on the Darwin Core standard. It is our hope that the pollination ecology community will see the importance of these or other evaluations of data quality and adopt them accordingly.

Journal of Pollination EcologyVol. 38
University of Northampton (GB)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, UK Research and Innovation, Agenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Natural Environment Research Council, CHIST-ERA
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant and animal studies
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.