Evaluation of the impact of using a steerable sheath and bubble filters on the incidence of asymptomatic brain lesions following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation

Abstract Introduction and Objectives Asymptomatic brain lesions are a common complication of AF ablation, with proposed mechanisms including air or steam embolism, plasma protein coagulation, and thrombus formation. This study aims to investigate whether the use of a steerable sheath for the ablation catheter and bubble filters can impact the incidence of asymptomatic brain lesions detectable by MRI after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods The POWER FAST III study compared pulmonary vein ablation using conventional power delivered radiofrequency (CPD) with 25-40W versus high power (70W) and short duration (9–10s, HPSD). A cerebral MRI substudy was conducted on consecutive patients within <24 hours after ablation to detect acute ischemic brain lesions (DWI+ sequence). The effect of using or not using a steerable sheath (S+/S-) for the ablation catheter and bubble filters (F+/F-) in the perfusion lines (transseptal sheath, steerable sheath, and irrigation of the ablation catheter) was studied across 4 groups of consecutive patients (S+/F+, S+/F-, S-/F+, S-/F-) to assess the incidence of this complication. Results A total of 141 patients were included (60±11 years, 71% male, persistent AF 38%, CPD group 47%, and HPSD group 53%). The distribution by subgroup was S+/F+ 33 patients, S+/F- 52 patients, S-/F+ 43 patients, and S-/F- 13 patients. DWI+ lesions were detected in 58 (41%) patients, being more frequent in persistent AF cases (55% vs 45%, P=0.01) and in the HPSD group (67% vs 33%, P<0.01). The incidence of lesions by sheath and filter usage was: S+/F- 21 (40%), S+/F+ 13 (40%), S-/F+ 20 (46%), and S-/F- 4 (30%), P=0.77. Neither the use of a steerable sheath nor bubble filters, analyzed independently, was associated with a significantly different rate of brain lesions (V+ 40% vs V- 43%, P=0.74 and F+ 45% vs F- 38%, P=0.48). Conclusions The use of bubble filters and the avoidance of a steerable sheath do not reduce the incidence of asymptomatic brain lesions following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.218
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the impact of using a steerable sheath and bubble filters on the incidence of asymptomatic brain lesions following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation

Marcel Martínez Cossiani, Paula Sánchez-Somonte, María Victoria Rossa, Davide Sorice et al.
EP Europace
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Evaluation of the impact of using a steerable sheath and bubble filters on the incidence of asymptomatic brain lesions following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation

Marcel Martínez Cossiani, Paula Sánchez-Somonte, María Victoria Rossa, Davide Sorice, Sergio Castrejón Castrejón, Beatriz Sanz Verdejo, Raúl Moreno, JL Merino, M J Maldonado
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction and Objectives Asymptomatic brain lesions are a common complication of AF ablation, with proposed mechanisms including air or steam embolism, plasma protein coagulation, and thrombus formation. This study aims to investigate whether the use of a steerable sheath for the ablation catheter and bubble filters can impact the incidence of asymptomatic brain lesions detectable by MRI after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods The POWER FAST III study compared pulmonary vein ablation using conventional power delivered radiofrequency (CPD) with 25-40W versus high power (70W) and short duration (9–10s, HPSD). A cerebral MRI substudy was conducted on consecutive patients within <24 hours after ablation to detect acute ischemic brain lesions (DWI+ sequence). The effect of using or not using a steerable sheath (S+/S-) for the ablation catheter and bubble filters (F+/F-) in the perfusion lines (transseptal sheath, steerable sheath, and irrigation of the ablation catheter) was studied across 4 groups of consecutive patients (S+/F+, S+/F-, S-/F+, S-/F-) to assess the incidence of this complication. Results A total of 141 patients were included (60±11 years, 71% male, persistent AF 38%, CPD group 47%, and HPSD group 53%). The distribution by subgroup was S+/F+ 33 patients, S+/F- 52 patients, S-/F+ 43 patients, and S-/F- 13 patients. DWI+ lesions were detected in 58 (41%) patients, being more frequent in persistent AF cases (55% vs 45%, P=0.01) and in the HPSD group (67% vs 33%, P<0.01). The incidence of lesions by sheath and filter usage was: S+/F- 21 (40%), S+/F+ 13 (40%), S-/F+ 20 (46%), and S-/F- 4 (30%), P=0.77. Neither the use of a steerable sheath nor bubble filters, analyzed independently, was associated with a significantly different rate of brain lesions (V+ 40% vs V- 43%, P=0.74 and F+ 45% vs F- 38%, P=0.48). Conclusions The use of bubble filters and the avoidance of a steerable sheath do not reduce the incidence of asymptomatic brain lesions following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
Sociedad Española de Cardiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.