Nonprofit and For‐Profit Microfinance Institutions: Governance, Outreach and Sustainability

ABSTRACT Microfinance was initially established to serve the poor and financially excluded. However, the allure of high repayment rates and low non‐performing loans has attracted for‐profit investors to the microfinance landscape, seeking not only to extend loan services to the poor but also to generate profits. Consequently, a growing number of for‐profit Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) have emerged in developing countries. This study examines the implications of profit orientation on the governance structure, outreach goal, and financial sustainability of MFIs. To accomplish this, we collected data from 1189 unique MFIs in 105 countries spanning 2010 to 2018 and applied both non‐parametric (e.g., t ‐test and Kruskal Wallis) and parametric tests (e.g., regressions analysis). Our findings revealed significant differences in governance structure between for‐profit and nonprofit MFIs, with the latter exhibiting larger board sizes and greater gender diversity. We also observed variations in outreach, with nonprofit MFIs demonstrating broader coverage and greater depth. Finally, empirical evidence highlighted differences in financial sustainability, as nonprofit MFIs tend to have higher financial health than their for‐profit counterparts. However, the effect of nonprofit status was mostly consistent with the baseline results for middle‐income countries but mixed and insignificant for low‐income countries (except for governance indicators). These findings have policy implications, underscoring the need for MFIs transitioning from nonprofit to for‐profit status to adapt their governance structure, realign their outreach mission, and refocus on financial sustainability accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21666
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonprofit and For‐Profit Microfinance Institutions: Governance, Outreach and Sustainability

A. S. A. Ferdous Alam, Md Aslam Mia, Adamu Jibir, Sunil Sangwan et al.
5 citations
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
15.66
article

Nonprofit and For‐Profit Microfinance Institutions: Governance, Outreach and Sustainability

A. S. A. Ferdous Alam, Md Aslam Mia, Adamu Jibir, Sunil Sangwan, Rossanto Dwi Handoyo, Musa Abdu, Noor Hazlina Ahmad
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Microfinance was initially established to serve the poor and financially excluded. However, the allure of high repayment rates and low non‐performing loans has attracted for‐profit investors to the microfinance landscape, seeking not only to extend loan services to the poor but also to generate profits. Consequently, a growing number of for‐profit Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) have emerged in developing countries. This study examines the implications of profit orientation on the governance structure, outreach goal, and financial sustainability of MFIs. To accomplish this, we collected data from 1189 unique MFIs in 105 countries spanning 2010 to 2018 and applied both non‐parametric (e.g., t ‐test and Kruskal Wallis) and parametric tests (e.g., regressions analysis). Our findings revealed significant differences in governance structure between for‐profit and nonprofit MFIs, with the latter exhibiting larger board sizes and greater gender diversity. We also observed variations in outreach, with nonprofit MFIs demonstrating broader coverage and greater depth. Finally, empirical evidence highlighted differences in financial sustainability, as nonprofit MFIs tend to have higher financial health than their for‐profit counterparts. However, the effect of nonprofit status was mostly consistent with the baseline results for middle‐income countries but mixed and insignificant for low‐income countries (except for governance indicators). These findings have policy implications, underscoring the need for MFIs transitioning from nonprofit to for‐profit status to adapt their governance structure, realign their outreach mission, and refocus on financial sustainability accordingly.

Nonprofit Management and LeadershipVol. 36(3)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Institute of Rural Management Anand (IN), Universitas Airlangga (ID), International University of Business Agriculture and Technology (BD), Gombe State University (NG), Northern University of Malaysia (MY)
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
15.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.