Evaluating the Use of Fourier Transform Raman Spectroscopy for Pollen Chemical Characterization

Vibrational spectroscopy is gaining popularity for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns in plants, particularly in relation to the analysis of pollen grains. So far, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) has been the main approach used to classify pollen grains based on chemical variations. However, FT-IR may be less suitable for detecting differences in the pollen grain exine, mainly composed of sporopollenin. In contrast, Raman spectroscopy has increased sensitivity for the main chemical components found within sporopollenins. We compare the classification performance and chemical information provided by FT-IR and FT-Raman using a large dataset of <i>Quercus</i> L. pollen, comprising five species in three sections: (i) <i>Cerris</i>: <i>Q</i>. <i>suber</i>, (ii) <i>Ilex</i>: <i>Q. coccifera</i>, <i>Q. rotundifolia</i>, and (iii) <i>Quercus</i>: <i>Q. robur</i>, <i>Q. faginea</i>). Here, we used multiblock sparse partial least squares discriminant analyses (MB-sPLS-DA) analyses to directly compare the two infrared methods. Both FT-IR and FT-Raman successfully classified <i>Quercus</i> pollen to section level (100% accuracy). At the species level our models achieved ∼90% accuracy for FT-Raman and FT-IR separately and in the combined multiblock model. The multiblock results showed an increased number of sporopollenin peaks observed in FT-Raman spectra as compared to FT-IR. These peaks are also of a higher importance for classification. Results also showed differences in the types of vibrations that are of diagnostic value for the two infrared methods. CH<sub>2</sub> deformations are more important in FT-Raman, while C-O-C, C-O, and C = O stretches are more important for FT-IR-based identification of pollen. These vibrations are indicators of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. FT-Raman provides equally successful diagnostic potential to FT-IR, but uses more chemical information based on variations in sporopollenin chemistry than FT-IR. We suggest that the combined analysis of FT-IR and FT-Raman using multiblock analysis has great potential for classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Spectroscopy
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028251334405
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Use of Fourier Transform Raman Spectroscopy for Pollen Chemical Characterization

Florian Muthreich, Achim Köhler, Alistair W. R. Seddon, Valeria Tafintseva et al.
3 citations
Applied Spectroscopy
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
2.26
article

Evaluating the Use of Fourier Transform Raman Spectroscopy for Pollen Chemical Characterization

Florian Muthreich, Achim Köhler, Alistair W. R. Seddon, Valeria Tafintseva, Carlos Vila-Viçosa, Boris Zimmermann
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Vibrational spectroscopy is gaining popularity for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns in plants, particularly in relation to the analysis of pollen grains. So far, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) has been the main approach used to classify pollen grains based on chemical variations. However, FT-IR may be less suitable for detecting differences in the pollen grain exine, mainly composed of sporopollenin. In contrast, Raman spectroscopy has increased sensitivity for the main chemical components found within sporopollenins. We compare the classification performance and chemical information provided by FT-IR and FT-Raman using a large dataset of <i>Quercus</i> L. pollen, comprising five species in three sections: (i) <i>Cerris</i>: <i>Q</i>. <i>suber</i>, (ii) <i>Ilex</i>: <i>Q. coccifera</i>, <i>Q. rotundifolia</i>, and (iii) <i>Quercus</i>: <i>Q. robur</i>, <i>Q. faginea</i>). Here, we used multiblock sparse partial least squares discriminant analyses (MB-sPLS-DA) analyses to directly compare the two infrared methods. Both FT-IR and FT-Raman successfully classified <i>Quercus</i> pollen to section level (100% accuracy). At the species level our models achieved ∼90% accuracy for FT-Raman and FT-IR separately and in the combined multiblock model. The multiblock results showed an increased number of sporopollenin peaks observed in FT-Raman spectra as compared to FT-IR. These peaks are also of a higher importance for classification. Results also showed differences in the types of vibrations that are of diagnostic value for the two infrared methods. CH<sub>2</sub> deformations are more important in FT-Raman, while C-O-C, C-O, and C = O stretches are more important for FT-IR-based identification of pollen. These vibrations are indicators of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. FT-Raman provides equally successful diagnostic potential to FT-IR, but uses more chemical information based on variations in sporopollenin chemistry than FT-IR. We suggest that the combined analysis of FT-IR and FT-Raman using multiblock analysis has great potential for classification.

Applied SpectroscopyVol. 79(7)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), University of Bergen (NO), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.