COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RAG METHODS FOR BUILDING RUSSIAN-SPEAKING INTELLIGENT SERVICES

The paper discusses one of the currently most popular approaches to building various types of intelligent assistants and query-response systems based on large language models (LLMs), based on in-context learning or retrieval augmented generation (RAG). The recent proliferation of publications on this topic is primarily English-oriented and utilizes leading-quality models such as GPT-4o and their developments. At the same time, evaluations of RAG context search methods for Russian language tasks are practically absent, which makes it an urgent task to conduct research aimed at adapting and evaluating these methods for the Russian language. Aim. To study the effectiveness of different retrieval augmented generation (RAG) approaches for Russian-language tasks, given that most studies in this area are English-oriented and use leading models such as GPT-4. Materials and Methods. The paper reviews three basic approaches to RAG construction: naive RAG, HyDE, and a probabilistic approach based on the BM25 function. Parti¬cular attention is paid to assessing the quality of these methods in terms of the mean average precision (mAP) metric for the three knowledge domains. Combined RAG methods such as SelfRAG were not used to obtain separate evaluations of each approach. Russian language text corpora were selected for the expe¬riments for the knowledge domains: oil and gas industry and jurisprudence. Results. The conducted study allowed us to obtain quality scores for each of the considered methods. The results agree well with the data of other studies, but are inferior to the known RAGs in English. Conclusion. The obtained results can be used as baseline evaluations and as a basis for making decisions on selecting optimal RAG architectures for Russian-language tasks. Further research will be aimed at integrating combined methods and adapting models to improve the quality of Russian language generation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the South Ural State University Ser Computer Technologies Automatic Control & Radioelectronics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14529/ctcr250201
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RAG METHODS FOR BUILDING RUSSIAN-SPEAKING INTELLIGENT SERVICES

V.R. Abbazov, Ivan Nikolaev, Andrey Melnikov, Mikhail A. Rusanov
Bulletin of the South Ural State University Ser Computer Technologies Automatic Control & Radioelectronics
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RAG METHODS FOR BUILDING RUSSIAN-SPEAKING INTELLIGENT SERVICES

V.R. Abbazov, Ivan Nikolaev, Andrey Melnikov, Mikhail A. Rusanov
article en

Abstract

The paper discusses one of the currently most popular approaches to building various types of intelligent assistants and query-response systems based on large language models (LLMs), based on in-context learning or retrieval augmented generation (RAG). The recent proliferation of publications on this topic is primarily English-oriented and utilizes leading-quality models such as GPT-4o and their developments. At the same time, evaluations of RAG context search methods for Russian language tasks are practically absent, which makes it an urgent task to conduct research aimed at adapting and evaluating these methods for the Russian language. Aim. To study the effectiveness of different retrieval augmented generation (RAG) approaches for Russian-language tasks, given that most studies in this area are English-oriented and use leading models such as GPT-4. Materials and Methods. The paper reviews three basic approaches to RAG construction: naive RAG, HyDE, and a probabilistic approach based on the BM25 function. Parti¬cular attention is paid to assessing the quality of these methods in terms of the mean average precision (mAP) metric for the three knowledge domains. Combined RAG methods such as SelfRAG were not used to obtain separate evaluations of each approach. Russian language text corpora were selected for the expe¬riments for the knowledge domains: oil and gas industry and jurisprudence. Results. The conducted study allowed us to obtain quality scores for each of the considered methods. The results agree well with the data of other studies, but are inferior to the known RAGs in English. Conclusion. The obtained results can be used as baseline evaluations and as a basis for making decisions on selecting optimal RAG architectures for Russian-language tasks. Further research will be aimed at integrating combined methods and adapting models to improve the quality of Russian language generation.

Bulletin of the South Ural State University Ser Computer Technologies Automatic Control & RadioelectronicsVol. 25(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Advanced Data Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.