Circularity and Sustainability: A Course that Advances Critical Thinking and Teamwork via Art, Community, and Policy

An opportunity exists for circular resource use, decreasing environmental impact and economic risk and at the same time enhancing biodiversity and global standards of living. When viewed from the perspective of an engineering student, technology is the solution. When viewed from the perspective of a policy student, policy is the way to solve these problems. The public, culture, and the social side of circularity? This is typically not considered in the education of our future science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) and policy professionals. To truly create circular systems, however, we need a different approach. We need the combined effort of scientists, engineers, cultural leaders, policy makers, industry, communities, and artists. We need circularity professionals, regardless of discipline, to have observation, teamwork, creative thinking, perspective-taking, and critical analysis skills. As part of a University of Minnesota National Science Foundation-funded Research Traineeship (NRT) program, we have developed a three-credit course to fill these needs: A Circularity Revolution: Working to Close the Loop on Global Issues. The course is cotaught by a consulting artist and an environmental engineering professor and brings critical analysis tools to bear on technological and policy topics. Focusing on biases, varied perspectives, case-based learning, and shared mental models, this approach encourages cross-disciplinary dialogue. Here we present the learning objectives, approach, course structure, and outcomes of this course with the goal of providing information to facilitate the teaching of similar courses at peer institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Engineering Science
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2025.0040
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circularity and Sustainability: A Course that Advances Critical Thinking and Teamwork via Art, Community, and Policy

Paige J. Novak, William A. Arnold, Natasha C. Wright, Emily Goff et al.
3 citations
Environmental Engineering Science
Sustainability in Higher Education
26.78
article

Circularity and Sustainability: A Course that Advances Critical Thinking and Teamwork via Art, Community, and Policy

Paige J. Novak, William A. Arnold, Natasha C. Wright, Emily Goff, Gudrun Lock, Martha B. Weitekamp
article en
3 citations

Abstract

An opportunity exists for circular resource use, decreasing environmental impact and economic risk and at the same time enhancing biodiversity and global standards of living. When viewed from the perspective of an engineering student, technology is the solution. When viewed from the perspective of a policy student, policy is the way to solve these problems. The public, culture, and the social side of circularity? This is typically not considered in the education of our future science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) and policy professionals. To truly create circular systems, however, we need a different approach. We need the combined effort of scientists, engineers, cultural leaders, policy makers, industry, communities, and artists. We need circularity professionals, regardless of discipline, to have observation, teamwork, creative thinking, perspective-taking, and critical analysis skills. As part of a University of Minnesota National Science Foundation-funded Research Traineeship (NRT) program, we have developed a three-credit course to fill these needs: A Circularity Revolution: Working to Close the Loop on Global Issues. The course is cotaught by a consulting artist and an environmental engineering professor and brings critical analysis tools to bear on technological and policy topics. Focusing on biases, varied perspectives, case-based learning, and shared mental models, this approach encourages cross-disciplinary dialogue. Here we present the learning objectives, approach, course structure, and outcomes of this course with the goal of providing information to facilitate the teaching of similar courses at peer institutions.

Environmental Engineering ScienceVol. 42(8)
University of Minnesota (US), Minnesota Epilepsy Group (US), Minneapolis College of Art and Design (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sustainability in Higher Education
26.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.