Leftsided versus rightsided lead extraction

Abstract Background and aims Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is increasingly performed for malfunction or infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Because of anatomic differences, TLE for right-sided (RS) electrodes may differ in outcome. This study aimed to evaluate whether RS TLE differs in patient characteristics and outcomes compared to left-sided TLE. Methods We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent TLE at one University Hospital from 2013 until 2023 regarding clinical and radiological success and complications. Results 556 patients underwent 568 TLE from January 2013 until December 2023. Patients with RS TLE procedures (n=147, 25.9%) were older, more often PM-dependent, had longer lead dwelling time, more leads with passive fixation and were more often extracted for infection (Table 1). RS TLE procedures had a longer procedure duration, more often needed a snare-bailout strategy, resulted in lower radiological success rates and more major as well as minor complication rates (Table 2). Conclusion In our retrospective single-center analysis, RS TLE Procedures were more challenging concerning patient characteristics and resulted in lower TLE success as well as higher complication rates.Table 1– Baseline characteristics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.656
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leftsided versus rightsided lead extraction

Alexander Breitenstein, Jan Steffel, C Wiederkehr, Andreas Haeberlin et al.
EP Europace
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Leftsided versus rightsided lead extraction

Alexander Breitenstein, Jan Steffel, C Wiederkehr, Andreas Haeberlin, Daniel Höfer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is increasingly performed for malfunction or infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Because of anatomic differences, TLE for right-sided (RS) electrodes may differ in outcome. This study aimed to evaluate whether RS TLE differs in patient characteristics and outcomes compared to left-sided TLE. Methods We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent TLE at one University Hospital from 2013 until 2023 regarding clinical and radiological success and complications. Results 556 patients underwent 568 TLE from January 2013 until December 2023. Patients with RS TLE procedures (n=147, 25.9%) were older, more often PM-dependent, had longer lead dwelling time, more leads with passive fixation and were more often extracted for infection (Table 1). RS TLE procedures had a longer procedure duration, more often needed a snare-bailout strategy, resulted in lower radiological success rates and more major as well as minor complication rates (Table 2). Conclusion In our retrospective single-center analysis, RS TLE Procedures were more challenging concerning patient characteristics and resulted in lower TLE success as well as higher complication rates.Table 1– Baseline characteristics

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
University Hospital of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leftsided versus rightsided lead extraction — Alexander Breitenstein, Jan Steffel, et al. · EP Europace (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS