Focal lattice tip catheter toggling between pulsed field energy and radiofrequency vs. high power short duration for pulmonary vein isolation: a multicenter study

Abstract Introduction A novel focal 9mm lattice tip catheter, namely Sphere-9 (Affera Inc), has recently received regulatory approval and is part of a technology that allows the delivery of either pulsed electric field or radiofrequency energy and incorporates a proprietary 3D electroanatomical mapping system. Objective: to compare the acute procedural outcomes between focal 9-mm lattice tip catheter Sphere-9 (Affera Inc) and High-Power Short-Duration radiofrequency ablation (HPSD). Methods Consecutive AF patients undergoing first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the Affera system or HPSD in six different centres between August and June 2024 were prospectively included. In the Sphere-9 arm PVI was performed with PFA on the posterior wall and anteriorly with radiofrequency or PFA at the operator's discretion. In the HPSD arm PVI was performed anteriorly with 50W /550 ablation index and posteriorly with 40W or 50W/ 400 ablation index. Primary endpoints were acute procedural success, PVI time and first pass isolation. Primary safety endpoint included major complications occurring within 7 days post-ablation. Results 240 patients (mean age: 65.9 ± 10.4 years; 64.4% males; 34.9% had non-paroxysmal AF) were enrolled (Sphere-9: 120 pts; HPSD: 120 pts). The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups. Sphere-9 significantly reduced PVI time compared to HPSD ( 25 min vs 31 min; p=0.003). Sphere-9 demonstrated a significantly higher rate of first pass isolation than HPSD (90.8% vs 67.1%; p<0.0001) (Figure 1). No differences were reported for major complications (0% vs 0.8%; p=0.31) and overall complications between Sphere-9 and HPSD (0% vs 1.7%; p=0.16). Sphere-9 significantly reduced procedural time (60 min vs 88 min; p<0.001), dwelling time (41 min vs 66 min; p<0.001) and fluoroscopy time ( 4 min vs 6 min; p=0.04) compared to HPSD. Conclusions Sphere-9 proved to significantly reduce PVI, procedure, dwelling and fluoroscopy time compared to HPSD ensuring a higher rate of first pass isolation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EP Europace
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf085.217
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Focal lattice tip catheter toggling between pulsed field energy and radiofrequency vs. high power short duration for pulmonary vein isolation: a multicenter study

Vlada V. Maslova, C De Asmundis, Della Rocca, Luigi Pannone et al.
EP Europace
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Focal lattice tip catheter toggling between pulsed field energy and radiofrequency vs. high power short duration for pulmonary vein isolation: a multicenter study

Vlada V. Maslova, C De Asmundis, Della Rocca, Luigi Pannone, Serge Bovéda, Giampaolo Vetta, Roberto Scacciavillani, Evgeny Lyan, Jonathan Lyne, Gian‐Battista Chierchia, Gemma Pelargonio, A Sarkozy, Ioannis Doundoulakis, M Efremidis, Jesús Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction A novel focal 9mm lattice tip catheter, namely Sphere-9 (Affera Inc), has recently received regulatory approval and is part of a technology that allows the delivery of either pulsed electric field or radiofrequency energy and incorporates a proprietary 3D electroanatomical mapping system. Objective: to compare the acute procedural outcomes between focal 9-mm lattice tip catheter Sphere-9 (Affera Inc) and High-Power Short-Duration radiofrequency ablation (HPSD). Methods Consecutive AF patients undergoing first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the Affera system or HPSD in six different centres between August and June 2024 were prospectively included. In the Sphere-9 arm PVI was performed with PFA on the posterior wall and anteriorly with radiofrequency or PFA at the operator's discretion. In the HPSD arm PVI was performed anteriorly with 50W /550 ablation index and posteriorly with 40W or 50W/ 400 ablation index. Primary endpoints were acute procedural success, PVI time and first pass isolation. Primary safety endpoint included major complications occurring within 7 days post-ablation. Results 240 patients (mean age: 65.9 ± 10.4 years; 64.4% males; 34.9% had non-paroxysmal AF) were enrolled (Sphere-9: 120 pts; HPSD: 120 pts). The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups. Sphere-9 significantly reduced PVI time compared to HPSD ( 25 min vs 31 min; p=0.003). Sphere-9 demonstrated a significantly higher rate of first pass isolation than HPSD (90.8% vs 67.1%; p<0.0001) (Figure 1). No differences were reported for major complications (0% vs 0.8%; p=0.31) and overall complications between Sphere-9 and HPSD (0% vs 1.7%; p=0.16). Sphere-9 significantly reduced procedural time (60 min vs 88 min; p<0.001), dwelling time (41 min vs 66 min; p<0.001) and fluoroscopy time ( 4 min vs 6 min; p=0.04) compared to HPSD. Conclusions Sphere-9 proved to significantly reduce PVI, procedure, dwelling and fluoroscopy time compared to HPSD ensuring a higher rate of first pass isolation.

EP EuropaceVol. 27(Supplement_1)
Beacon College (US), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center (GR), Clinique Pasteur (FR), University of Lübeck (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.