The Mathematical Complement of David Rittenhouse

Abstract: David Rittenhouse (1732–1796) was considered the premier American scientist of his time, after Benjamin Franklin (1703–1790) died and Rittenhouse succeeded him as president of the American Philosophical Society (APS) in 1791. In eighteenth-century fashion, he was also termed a mathematician, as were a handful of his colleagues. In fact, Rittenhouse’s work, in one instance, was more advanced than that of his European contemporaries: when others were only able to optimally approximate algebraic irrationals, he was using continued fractions to approximate transcendental ones.1 My goal in this study was to more carefully examine the mathematical community around Rittenhouse, at home and abroad, to test whether Rittenhouse’s advanced facility with continued fraction approximation technique really was singular, or if, in fact, there was a broader mathematical community understanding of continued fractions and Rittenhouse’s work was only a slight variation of that of his contemporaries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledge
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pro.2024.a960773
Primary Topic
History and Theory of Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mathematical Complement of David Rittenhouse

M. Alexander
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledge
History and Theory of Mathematics
article

The Mathematical Complement of David Rittenhouse

M. Alexander
article en

Abstract

Abstract: David Rittenhouse (1732–1796) was considered the premier American scientist of his time, after Benjamin Franklin (1703–1790) died and Rittenhouse succeeded him as president of the American Philosophical Society (APS) in 1791. In eighteenth-century fashion, he was also termed a mathematician, as were a handful of his colleagues. In fact, Rittenhouse’s work, in one instance, was more advanced than that of his European contemporaries: when others were only able to optimally approximate algebraic irrationals, he was using continued fractions to approximate transcendental ones.1 My goal in this study was to more carefully examine the mathematical community around Rittenhouse, at home and abroad, to test whether Rittenhouse’s advanced facility with continued fraction approximation technique really was singular, or if, in fact, there was a broader mathematical community understanding of continued fractions and Rittenhouse’s work was only a slight variation of that of his contemporaries.

Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledgeVol. 165(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
History and Theory of Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Mathematical Complement of David Rittenhouse — M. Alexander · Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledge (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS