Development and validation of a predictive model for hospital mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit

ObjectiveThis retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.MethodsData of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database, and the patients were randomly allocated into training (n = 3798, 70%) and validation (n = 1629, 30%) cohorts. First-day intensive care unit admission parameters were averaged. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors in the training cohort, followed by nomogram construction. Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination (area under the curve), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test and bootstrap resampling), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). Data from emergency intensive care unit were used to perform external validation of the value of the model.ResultsIn total, 5427 patients were included. Age, red cell distribution width, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology Score-III, blood urea nitrogen-to-serum creatinine ratio, anion gap, osmolarity, and sepsis were identified as independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Acute Physiology Score-III in the validation (area under the curve: 0.772 vs. 0.685-0.724) and training (area under the curve: 0.787 vs. 0.708-0.740; <i>p </i><<i> </i>0.05) sets. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed robust performance (Hosmer-Lemeshow <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.11; net benefit threshold: 20%-80%). In both cohorts, calibration and decision curve analyses showed that the nomogram had good calibration degree, discriminative ability, and clinical benefits. Data from emergency intensive care unit showed that the area under the curve of the model was 0.7864 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.81), area under the curve of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was 0.7217 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.75), and area under the curve of Acute Physiology Score-III was 0.7055 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73).ConclusionsThis nomogram provides moderate predictive accuracy for hospital mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia and may aid prognosis assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Medical Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251340304
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a predictive model for hospital mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit

Zhijiang Qi, Xuefeng Song, Bo Liu, Zhang Qiang
Journal of International Medical Research
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

Development and validation of a predictive model for hospital mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit

Zhijiang Qi, Xuefeng Song, Bo Liu, Zhang Qiang
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThis retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.MethodsData of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database, and the patients were randomly allocated into training (n = 3798, 70%) and validation (n = 1629, 30%) cohorts. First-day intensive care unit admission parameters were averaged. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors in the training cohort, followed by nomogram construction. Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination (area under the curve), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test and bootstrap resampling), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). Data from emergency intensive care unit were used to perform external validation of the value of the model.ResultsIn total, 5427 patients were included. Age, red cell distribution width, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology Score-III, blood urea nitrogen-to-serum creatinine ratio, anion gap, osmolarity, and sepsis were identified as independent risk factors for hospital mortality. The nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Acute Physiology Score-III in the validation (area under the curve: 0.772 vs. 0.685-0.724) and training (area under the curve: 0.787 vs. 0.708-0.740; <i>p </i><<i> </i>0.05) sets. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed robust performance (Hosmer-Lemeshow <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.11; net benefit threshold: 20%-80%). In both cohorts, calibration and decision curve analyses showed that the nomogram had good calibration degree, discriminative ability, and clinical benefits. Data from emergency intensive care unit showed that the area under the curve of the model was 0.7864 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.81), area under the curve of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was 0.7217 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.75), and area under the curve of Acute Physiology Score-III was 0.7055 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73).ConclusionsThis nomogram provides moderate predictive accuracy for hospital mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia and may aid prognosis assessment.

Journal of International Medical ResearchVol. 53(5)
Binzhou Medical University (CN), Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN), Shanxi Medical University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Beijing YouAn Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.