A Matter of Reconciliation: General James Clark Strong Practices American Indian Law in Gilded-Age Buffalo

Abstract: James Clark Strong of Buffalo served as attorney for the Seneca Nation in western New York and the Cayuga Nation of the Grand River in Canada during the last two decades of the nineteenth century. Unlike other attorneys at the time, he saw them as transnational peoples with legitimate grievances related to violations of their treaty rights. Strong was heavily influenced by the teachings of missionary Marcus Whitman and by his own personal experiences on the frontier in the Pacific Northwest and in the Civil War. While never achieving his goal of winning cases for his two Native American clients and bringing reconciliation between Indian and non-Indian to make up for a violent and unjust past, he, nevertheless, was the first attorney to use the legal reasoning based on violations of the Federal Trade and Intercourse Acts. This argument was successfully resurrected by attorneys in the last half century to win back lands and financial compensation for Native American communities from Maine to South Carolina.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledge
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pro.2024.a960769
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Matter of Reconciliation: General James Clark Strong Practices American Indian Law in Gilded-Age Buffalo

Laurence M. Hauptman
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledge
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

A Matter of Reconciliation: General James Clark Strong Practices American Indian Law in Gilded-Age Buffalo

Laurence M. Hauptman
article en

Abstract

Abstract: James Clark Strong of Buffalo served as attorney for the Seneca Nation in western New York and the Cayuga Nation of the Grand River in Canada during the last two decades of the nineteenth century. Unlike other attorneys at the time, he saw them as transnational peoples with legitimate grievances related to violations of their treaty rights. Strong was heavily influenced by the teachings of missionary Marcus Whitman and by his own personal experiences on the frontier in the Pacific Northwest and in the Civil War. While never achieving his goal of winning cases for his two Native American clients and bringing reconciliation between Indian and non-Indian to make up for a violent and unjust past, he, nevertheless, was the first attorney to use the legal reasoning based on violations of the Federal Trade and Intercourse Acts. This argument was successfully resurrected by attorneys in the last half century to win back lands and financial compensation for Native American communities from Maine to South Carolina.

Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledgeVol. 165(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Matter of Reconciliation: General James Clark Strong Practices American Indian Law in Gilded-Age Buffalo — Laurence M. Hauptman · Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society held at Philadelphia for promoting useful knowledge (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS