Comparative Analysis of Feature Selection Methods in Clustering-Based Detection Methods

Feature selection plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack detection methods, particularly as network traffic data becomes increasingly complex. This study conducts a categorical investigation of feature selection methods in clustering-based DDoS attack detection, comparing wrapper and hybrid approaches. Through two experiments using one-way ANOVA analyses, the research evaluated the effectiveness of different clustering approaches and supervised learning algorithms. The findings reveal that clustering-based wrapper methods performed more effectively than supervised learning approaches in feature selection for clustering-based DDoS attack detection methods. The results show strong statistical significance for clustering-based methods, with p-values of less than 0.05 and η2 values indicating robust relationships between methods. Our clustering-based wrapper approach achieved a 57.7% reduction in false positive rates compared to supervised learning methods (mean FPR of 0.17 versus 0.40) on the CICIDS2017 dataset, with certain configurations reaching a false positive rate of 0.000. A similar pattern was observed with the NSL-KD dataset, where clustering-based methods reduced false positive rates by 63.1% compared to supervised approaches (0.048 versus 0.128). This study provides empirical evidence for effective combinations in which organizations and agencies can implement DDoS attack detection methods that have high performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112119
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Feature Selection Methods in Clustering-Based Detection Methods

Alireza Zeinalpour, Charles P. McElroy
Electronics
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Comparative Analysis of Feature Selection Methods in Clustering-Based Detection Methods

Alireza Zeinalpour, Charles P. McElroy
article en

Abstract

Feature selection plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack detection methods, particularly as network traffic data becomes increasingly complex. This study conducts a categorical investigation of feature selection methods in clustering-based DDoS attack detection, comparing wrapper and hybrid approaches. Through two experiments using one-way ANOVA analyses, the research evaluated the effectiveness of different clustering approaches and supervised learning algorithms. The findings reveal that clustering-based wrapper methods performed more effectively than supervised learning approaches in feature selection for clustering-based DDoS attack detection methods. The results show strong statistical significance for clustering-based methods, with p-values of less than 0.05 and η2 values indicating robust relationships between methods. Our clustering-based wrapper approach achieved a 57.7% reduction in false positive rates compared to supervised learning methods (mean FPR of 0.17 versus 0.40) on the CICIDS2017 dataset, with certain configurations reaching a false positive rate of 0.000. A similar pattern was observed with the NSL-KD dataset, where clustering-based methods reduced false positive rates by 63.1% compared to supervised approaches (0.048 versus 0.128). This study provides empirical evidence for effective combinations in which organizations and agencies can implement DDoS attack detection methods that have high performance.

ElectronicsVol. 14(11)
Cleveland State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.