He says she says: From indirect speech to a voice of her own

Abstract We propose that Catullus’s literary character Lesbia derives much of her allure—evident in her long history of reception—from her characterization as indirect and enigmatic, in particular when Catullus reports what she says. Three examples from Catullus’ reception in the twentieth and twenty-first century literature are considered, each presenting a strikingly different Lesbia. We then contrast these modern interpretations that strive to give a literary character a voice of her own with Lesbia in Catullus’s poems to whom not a single line of direct speech is attributed. This observation is situated in a—partly quantitative—analysis of the overall prevalence of indirect speech and related forms of implied speech over direct speech in Catullus’ work. This analysis will expose the grammatical basis of the threat of (poetic) gossip central to Catullus’ poems. In c. 70, we identify a passage that is—due to the rudiments of a mimetic indirect discourse—sufficiently polyvalent to account for the strikingly dissimilar Lesbias encountered in the literary examples mentioned above.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neohelicon
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-025-00800-0
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

He says she says: From indirect speech to a voice of her own

Andrea Harbach, Ton Tromp
Neohelicon
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

He says she says: From indirect speech to a voice of her own

Andrea Harbach, Ton Tromp
article en

Abstract

Abstract We propose that Catullus’s literary character Lesbia derives much of her allure—evident in her long history of reception—from her characterization as indirect and enigmatic, in particular when Catullus reports what she says. Three examples from Catullus’ reception in the twentieth and twenty-first century literature are considered, each presenting a strikingly different Lesbia. We then contrast these modern interpretations that strive to give a literary character a voice of her own with Lesbia in Catullus’s poems to whom not a single line of direct speech is attributed. This observation is situated in a—partly quantitative—analysis of the overall prevalence of indirect speech and related forms of implied speech over direct speech in Catullus’ work. This analysis will expose the grammatical basis of the threat of (poetic) gossip central to Catullus’ poems. In c. 70, we identify a passage that is—due to the rudiments of a mimetic indirect discourse—sufficiently polyvalent to account for the strikingly dissimilar Lesbias encountered in the literary examples mentioned above.

NeoheliconVol. 52(1)
University of Groningen (NL), Dialyse Centrum Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.