Comparison of Cytopathology Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Using 25G Versus 27G Needles for Melanocytic Uveal Tumors

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aims to evaluate whether fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of melanocytic uveal tumors (MUTs) using 27-gauge (27G) needles yields aspirates like those obtained using 25-gauge (25G) needles for cytology. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review was conducted on 32 primary uveal melanomas (PUMs). Tumors were sampled at three adjacent sites, first using a 27G needle for gene expression profile (GEP) testing, second and third with 27G and 25G needles for cytology. The endpoints evaluated were the sufficiency of aspirates for cytopathology and GEP. <b>Results</b>: Among the 32 patients, 17 tumors were choroidal, 6 ciliochoroidal, 7 iridociliochoroidal, and 2 exclusively iridic. Tumor diameter ranged from 3.3 mm to 23 mm (mean 13.2 mm), and thickness ranged from 0.5 mm to 12 mm (mean 6.4 mm). Aspirates from both needle sizes were sufficient for cytopathological diagnosis and GEP in 31 of 32 cases (96.9%). The single insufficient aspirate was insufficient with both the 27G and 25G needles. The cytopathology was identical in all other cases. The tumors were Class 1 in 22 cases (71.0%) and Class 2 in 9 cases (29.0%). <b>Conclusions</b>: FNAB aspirates of MUTs using 27G needles appear sufficient for cytology and GEP in most cases, showing a similar diagnostic yield compared to 25G needles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113650
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Cytopathology Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Using 25G Versus 27G Needles for Melanocytic Uveal Tumors

James J. Augsburger, Zélia M. Corrêa, Costanzo Valente, Gustavo Rosa Gameiro
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
article

Comparison of Cytopathology Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Using 25G Versus 27G Needles for Melanocytic Uveal Tumors

James J. Augsburger, Zélia M. Corrêa, Costanzo Valente, Gustavo Rosa Gameiro
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aims to evaluate whether fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of melanocytic uveal tumors (MUTs) using 27-gauge (27G) needles yields aspirates like those obtained using 25-gauge (25G) needles for cytology. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review was conducted on 32 primary uveal melanomas (PUMs). Tumors were sampled at three adjacent sites, first using a 27G needle for gene expression profile (GEP) testing, second and third with 27G and 25G needles for cytology. The endpoints evaluated were the sufficiency of aspirates for cytopathology and GEP. <b>Results</b>: Among the 32 patients, 17 tumors were choroidal, 6 ciliochoroidal, 7 iridociliochoroidal, and 2 exclusively iridic. Tumor diameter ranged from 3.3 mm to 23 mm (mean 13.2 mm), and thickness ranged from 0.5 mm to 12 mm (mean 6.4 mm). Aspirates from both needle sizes were sufficient for cytopathological diagnosis and GEP in 31 of 32 cases (96.9%). The single insufficient aspirate was insufficient with both the 27G and 25G needles. The cytopathology was identical in all other cases. The tumors were Class 1 in 22 cases (71.0%) and Class 2 in 9 cases (29.0%). <b>Conclusions</b>: FNAB aspirates of MUTs using 27G needles appear sufficient for cytology and GEP in most cases, showing a similar diagnostic yield compared to 25G needles.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(11)
University of Miami (US), Centro Universitário Lusíada (BR), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, University of Miami, University of Cincinnati, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health Systems, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.