Does quality matter? An analysis of mentoring functions, mentorship quality and employee outcomes

Purpose Drawing on Social Exchange Theory (SET), the purpose of this paper is to explore whether mentorship quality mediates the link between mentor functions (career support, psychosocial support and role modeling) and employee outcomes (organizational commitment, self-esteem and employee well-being). Design/methodology/approach Hypotheses were tested among 268 full-time employees who engaged in a mentoring relationship from a range of organizations using path analysis in AMOS. Findings Results showed that mentorship quality fully mediates the relationships between mentor functions and the employee outcomes of self-esteem and employee well-being. Originality/value This present study broadens the body of literature applying SET in workplace contexts and tests a model in which mentorship quality mediates the relationships between the mentor functions and protégé outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Workplace Learning
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-12-2024-0274
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does quality matter? An analysis of mentoring functions, mentorship quality and employee outcomes

David Sloan, Craig Hinnenkamp, Alan C. Mikkelson
1 citations
Journal of Workplace Learning
Mentoring and Academic Development
2.44
article

Does quality matter? An analysis of mentoring functions, mentorship quality and employee outcomes

David Sloan, Craig Hinnenkamp, Alan C. Mikkelson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Drawing on Social Exchange Theory (SET), the purpose of this paper is to explore whether mentorship quality mediates the link between mentor functions (career support, psychosocial support and role modeling) and employee outcomes (organizational commitment, self-esteem and employee well-being). Design/methodology/approach Hypotheses were tested among 268 full-time employees who engaged in a mentoring relationship from a range of organizations using path analysis in AMOS. Findings Results showed that mentorship quality fully mediates the relationships between mentor functions and the employee outcomes of self-esteem and employee well-being. Originality/value This present study broadens the body of literature applying SET in workplace contexts and tests a model in which mentorship quality mediates the relationships between the mentor functions and protégé outcomes.

Journal of Workplace LearningVol. 37(5-6)
Whitworth University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mentoring and Academic Development
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does quality matter? An analysis of mentoring functions, mentorship quality and employee outcomes — David Sloan, Craig Hinnenkamp, et al. · Journal of Workplace Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS