Impact of Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

<b>Background:</b> This study aims to demonstrate the challenges during the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis due to the development of dysplasia, which can be faced by surgeons who treat patients with THA. Our objective is to present our findings from a comparison of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), with or without a prior periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). <b>Methods:</b> We divided patients into two groups. Group A was adolescents who underwent periacetabular osteotomy and further THA in the orthopedic center (29 hips), and Group B was adolescents who underwent THA without PAO but suffered from DDH (24 hips). We measured blood loss, cup size, cup positioning, cup coverage, inclination and anteversion of the cup, duration of surgery, clinical scores, time of hospitalization, and the presence of ossification. <b>Results:</b> The mHHS score demonstrated significant differences (group A: 89 points vs. group B: 91 points; <i>p</i> = 0.03). The blood loss was expressed in the difference in Hb concentration preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day, which was higher by 0.85 mg/dL in group A (group A: 4.4 mg/dl vs. group B: 3.55 mg/dL; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Also, the value of HCT on the 3rd postoperative day was significantly lower in group A (group A: 27% vs. group B: 29.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Radiological measurements showed a statistically significant difference in the Brooker scale (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Thirteen patients from group A after THA expressed first-grade ossifications or higher, and two patients from group B had first- and second-grade ossifications. Furthermore, a notably larger distalization was observed after the PAO procedure compared to those who underwent the procedure without PAO previously (79 mm [IQR = 73-83 mm] vs. 74.5 mm [IQR = 69-77 mm]; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Conclusions: Patients reported lower mHHS results, a higher risk of heterotopic ossifications, prosthesis head distalization, and more significant blood loss during the perioperative period after THA in patients who underwent PAO compared to those without a previously performed osteotomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113661
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Adam Czwojdziński, Jarosław Czubak, Dariusz Grzelecki, Andrzej Sionek et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Impact of Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Adam Czwojdziński, Jarosław Czubak, Dariusz Grzelecki, Andrzej Sionek, Jakub Leśniak
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> This study aims to demonstrate the challenges during the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis due to the development of dysplasia, which can be faced by surgeons who treat patients with THA. Our objective is to present our findings from a comparison of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), with or without a prior periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). <b>Methods:</b> We divided patients into two groups. Group A was adolescents who underwent periacetabular osteotomy and further THA in the orthopedic center (29 hips), and Group B was adolescents who underwent THA without PAO but suffered from DDH (24 hips). We measured blood loss, cup size, cup positioning, cup coverage, inclination and anteversion of the cup, duration of surgery, clinical scores, time of hospitalization, and the presence of ossification. <b>Results:</b> The mHHS score demonstrated significant differences (group A: 89 points vs. group B: 91 points; <i>p</i> = 0.03). The blood loss was expressed in the difference in Hb concentration preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day, which was higher by 0.85 mg/dL in group A (group A: 4.4 mg/dl vs. group B: 3.55 mg/dL; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Also, the value of HCT on the 3rd postoperative day was significantly lower in group A (group A: 27% vs. group B: 29.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Radiological measurements showed a statistically significant difference in the Brooker scale (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Thirteen patients from group A after THA expressed first-grade ossifications or higher, and two patients from group B had first- and second-grade ossifications. Furthermore, a notably larger distalization was observed after the PAO procedure compared to those who underwent the procedure without PAO previously (79 mm [IQR = 73-83 mm] vs. 74.5 mm [IQR = 69-77 mm]; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Conclusions: Patients reported lower mHHS results, a higher risk of heterotopic ossifications, prosthesis head distalization, and more significant blood loss during the perioperative period after THA in patients who underwent PAO compared to those without a previously performed osteotomy.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(11)
Grochowski Hospital (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.