Good Faith Cooperatioan Agreement Between Companies Of Different Countries

This research examines and analyzes international contracts that do not fulfill the principle of good faith or in Indonesian means Good Faith because the agreement made by the parties is not reached, then there can be disputes between the parties who made the agreement and there could be parties who suffer losses if it arises. the dispute. The legal remedies chosen by the parties making the agreement must be stated in the contents of the agreement. The method used in normative research with a problem approach is the case approach. The research results in the form of Cooperation Agreements between companies from different countries have not implemented the principle of "good faith" in post-contracts in the form of implementing "good faith" so that disputes occur. The legal remedy chosen was also not implemented properly, even though the settlement option came from an agreement stated in the agreement through the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI). It is reasonable to suspect that this settlement option is not pure but because in international contracts the settlement is usually through the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI). The result is that one of the parties feels disadvantaged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i5.1542
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good Faith Cooperatioan Agreement Between Companies Of Different Countries

Setyo Widagdo, Rika Kurniaty, Karisma Bintang Pratama
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Good Faith Cooperatioan Agreement Between Companies Of Different Countries

Setyo Widagdo, Rika Kurniaty, Karisma Bintang Pratama
article en

Abstract

This research examines and analyzes international contracts that do not fulfill the principle of good faith or in Indonesian means Good Faith because the agreement made by the parties is not reached, then there can be disputes between the parties who made the agreement and there could be parties who suffer losses if it arises. the dispute. The legal remedies chosen by the parties making the agreement must be stated in the contents of the agreement. The method used in normative research with a problem approach is the case approach. The research results in the form of Cooperation Agreements between companies from different countries have not implemented the principle of "good faith" in post-contracts in the form of implementing "good faith" so that disputes occur. The legal remedy chosen was also not implemented properly, even though the settlement option came from an agreement stated in the agreement through the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI). It is reasonable to suspect that this settlement option is not pure but because in international contracts the settlement is usually through the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI). The result is that one of the parties feels disadvantaged.

International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)Vol. 4(5)
University of Brawijaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.