Cavitation-intensifying or vacuum bags for beef ultrasonication: effects on critical attributes for consumers and microstructure

This study evaluated the high-intensity ultrasonication (HIU) and type of enveloping bags on important quality attributes for beef consumers. Thirty-six pieces of m. Semimembranosus (2.5 × 1.5 × 7 cm) were randomly allocated to one of five treatments: Control, fresh meat; NA, unpacked meat ultrasonicated; meat sonicated inside thin vacuum bags (VB40) or commercial vacuum bags (VB70); or meat sonicated inside cavitation-intensifying bags (CIB). HIU increased the colour change (ΔE) and lightness and reduced redness regardless of the type of bag. VB40 and CIB produced the highest ΔE after ultrasonication. HIU reduced the weight loss after cooking and the total shear, but no significant differences were observed among bags. HIU and cooking process affected all parameters regardless the meat packaging. Remarkably, the type of bag produced relevant micro-structure changes in beef, despite they were not reflected in the physicochemical parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CyTA - Journal of Food
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2025.2501155
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cavitation-intensifying or vacuum bags for beef ultrasonication: effects on critical attributes for consumers and microstructure

Iván A. García-Galicia, David Fernández Rivas, Raheel Suleman, Pedro Zetina-Córdoba et al.
CyTA - Journal of Food
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
article

Cavitation-intensifying or vacuum bags for beef ultrasonication: effects on critical attributes for consumers and microstructure

Iván A. García-Galicia, David Fernández Rivas, Raheel Suleman, Pedro Zetina-Córdoba, Mariana Huerta‐Jimenez, José Enrique Blanco-Hernández
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the high-intensity ultrasonication (HIU) and type of enveloping bags on important quality attributes for beef consumers. Thirty-six pieces of m. Semimembranosus (2.5 × 1.5 × 7 cm) were randomly allocated to one of five treatments: Control, fresh meat; NA, unpacked meat ultrasonicated; meat sonicated inside thin vacuum bags (VB40) or commercial vacuum bags (VB70); or meat sonicated inside cavitation-intensifying bags (CIB). HIU increased the colour change (ΔE) and lightness and reduced redness regardless of the type of bag. VB40 and CIB produced the highest ΔE after ultrasonication. HIU reduced the weight loss after cooking and the total shear, but no significant differences were observed among bags. HIU and cooking process affected all parameters regardless the meat packaging. Remarkably, the type of bag produced relevant micro-structure changes in beef, despite they were not reflected in the physicochemical parameters.

CyTA - Journal of FoodVol. 23(1)
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico (PR), Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK), Autonomous University of Chihuahua (MX), Colegio de Postgraduados (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX), University of Twente (NL)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.