Texas in the Rear-View Mirror? How the Democratic Party Ignores Rural America and Underperforms in Elections

Abstract Political observers have asserted that Democrats have stopped campaigning for rural votes. Despite this refrain, little quantitative evidence has assessed its veracity. We also do not understand the broader electoral implications of these potential geographic changes in party organizing. To explore these questions, we merge two novel data sources on county party organizational capacity with county-level election data and survey data from the CES. Since 2016, the Democratic Party has failed to declare a party chair in about 20% of rural counties and did not field a candidate for Congress in nearly the same, while Republicans filled all but 4% of rural chairships and contested every rural seat. With broader data from Texas, we show even larger percentages of rural counties have uncontested State Senate and House seats. These changes are associated with decreased Democratic vote share in statewide races, turnout, and campaign contact. We estimate that the Democratic Party loses some of the rural vote in statewide elections by failing to organize and compete for it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Behavior
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10045-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Texas in the Rear-View Mirror? How the Democratic Party Ignores Rural America and Underperforms in Elections

Michael E. Shepherd, Clinton Willbanks
1 citations
Political Behavior
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
article

Texas in the Rear-View Mirror? How the Democratic Party Ignores Rural America and Underperforms in Elections

Michael E. Shepherd, Clinton Willbanks
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Political observers have asserted that Democrats have stopped campaigning for rural votes. Despite this refrain, little quantitative evidence has assessed its veracity. We also do not understand the broader electoral implications of these potential geographic changes in party organizing. To explore these questions, we merge two novel data sources on county party organizational capacity with county-level election data and survey data from the CES. Since 2016, the Democratic Party has failed to declare a party chair in about 20% of rural counties and did not field a candidate for Congress in nearly the same, while Republicans filled all but 4% of rural chairships and contested every rural seat. With broader data from Texas, we show even larger percentages of rural counties have uncontested State Senate and House seats. These changes are associated with decreased Democratic vote share in statewide races, turnout, and campaign contact. We estimate that the Democratic Party loses some of the rural vote in statewide elections by failing to organize and compete for it.

Political Behavior
University of Michigan (US), Department of Health Services (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.