Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy among outpatients completing the primary scheme in Turkey

Objective: To examine the change in COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy according to descriptive characteristics, characteristics related to COVID-19, health literacy (HL) skills related to booster dose. Methods: The inclusion criterion was the completion of the primary scheme as two doses of COVID-19 vaccine. The study was conducted in January 2022 by applying face-to-face interview technique. Questions regarding HL were used to question the ability of individuals to access, understand, interpret and use information regarding the COVID-19 booster dose in their decisions. Results: A total of 1 210 people were included in this study with an mean age of (41.3±16.6) years, and 51.4% were women. In multivariate analysis, hesitation increased in the “moderately concerned” (a OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.09-6.45), “slightly concerned” (a OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.26-7.19), “not concerned at all” (a OR 5.69, 95% CI 2.27-14.28) groups compared to the group “extremely concerned” about COVID-19 transmission. Those with Sinovac-CoronaVac as their most recent vaccine had increased hesitation compared to those with Pfizer-BioNTech (a OR 3.68, 95% CI 2.05-6.61). The effect of HL skills including “accessing”, “understanding”, and “appraising” information on hesitation was not statistically significant ( P >0.05). HL skill of “applying” was assessed with ability of information to help decision making. Whether the information is helpful for decision-making, the risk of hesitancy increased for those who stated that it “sometimes helps” (a OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.31-4.99) and “never helps” (a OR 11.62; 95% CI 3.03-44.58) compared to those who stated that it “always helps”. Conclusions: The increased propability of hesitation in those less concerned about COVID-19 transmission shows the importance of appropriately guiding individuals’ concern levels with a health communication strategy based on risk communication. The fact that the only HL skill with a significant effect in the multivariate model was “applying”, shows the critical role of this skill in influencing behavioral changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/apjtm.apjtm_198_24
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy among outpatients completing the primary scheme in Turkey

Cansu Özbaş, Mehmet Alperen Özçelik, Hakan Tüzün, Mustafa İlhan
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy among outpatients completing the primary scheme in Turkey

Cansu Özbaş, Mehmet Alperen Özçelik, Hakan Tüzün, Mustafa İlhan
article en

Abstract

Objective: To examine the change in COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy according to descriptive characteristics, characteristics related to COVID-19, health literacy (HL) skills related to booster dose. Methods: The inclusion criterion was the completion of the primary scheme as two doses of COVID-19 vaccine. The study was conducted in January 2022 by applying face-to-face interview technique. Questions regarding HL were used to question the ability of individuals to access, understand, interpret and use information regarding the COVID-19 booster dose in their decisions. Results: A total of 1 210 people were included in this study with an mean age of (41.3±16.6) years, and 51.4% were women. In multivariate analysis, hesitation increased in the “moderately concerned” (a OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.09-6.45), “slightly concerned” (a OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.26-7.19), “not concerned at all” (a OR 5.69, 95% CI 2.27-14.28) groups compared to the group “extremely concerned” about COVID-19 transmission. Those with Sinovac-CoronaVac as their most recent vaccine had increased hesitation compared to those with Pfizer-BioNTech (a OR 3.68, 95% CI 2.05-6.61). The effect of HL skills including “accessing”, “understanding”, and “appraising” information on hesitation was not statistically significant ( P >0.05). HL skill of “applying” was assessed with ability of information to help decision making. Whether the information is helpful for decision-making, the risk of hesitancy increased for those who stated that it “sometimes helps” (a OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.31-4.99) and “never helps” (a OR 11.62; 95% CI 3.03-44.58) compared to those who stated that it “always helps”. Conclusions: The increased propability of hesitation in those less concerned about COVID-19 transmission shows the importance of appropriately guiding individuals’ concern levels with a health communication strategy based on risk communication. The fact that the only HL skill with a significant effect in the multivariate model was “applying”, shows the critical role of this skill in influencing behavioral changes.

Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical MedicineVol. 18(5)
Gazi University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.