Conceptual system maps to guide research and management of multiple ecosystem services and disservices

• Simultaneous modelling of multiple ecosystem services is a pressing but hard task. • Conceptual system maps formalise our understanding of multiple ecosystem services. • Network analyses identify key system drivers for targeted data collection. • Conceptual system maps should be revised regularly to reflect updated knowledge. Integrated assessments of multiple natural capital and ecosystem services and disservices (ESD) are needed to guide research and management in South America. Unfortunately, a poor understanding of the drivers of ESD and a scarcity of data undermine these efforts. Here, we combine expert knowledge and network analyses to create conceptual system maps to support the research and management of multiple ESD. Using the example of the Lules River watershed (northwestern Argentina), we integrated the biotic, abiotic, socio-economic, and policy drivers of five ESD selected due to their relevance to human well-being and biodiversity conservation in the area: (i) aboveground carbon stock; (ii) water quality; (iii) water quantity; (iv) dengue transmission; and (v) leishmaniasis transmission. Through facilitated activities, we encoded expert knowledge into networks representing drivers and causal interactions between those drivers. We recorded 43 drivers, of which 18 were identified as key drivers based on network metrics. The majority of key drivers were abiotic and socio-economic drivers (38.9% and 33.3% of 18, respectively), and we found potential information sources for all of these key drivers. Conceptual system maps provided significant benefits for guiding ESD research and ecosystem-based management. First, they formalised our current understanding of the system and provided a model that can be updated with new information. Second, they can be analysed through established network metrics to uncover relationships critical to effective system-level management and identify key drivers for data-gathering efforts. These maps offer a rapid and interdisciplinary tool to overcome existing barriers to integrated assessments in data-poor areas and are a powerful method to support system-based approaches to environmental management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2025.04.004
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual system maps to guide research and management of multiple ecosystem services and disservices

Pablo García‐Díaz, María de Lourdes Gultemirian, Julieta Carilla, Oriana Osinaga Acosta et al.
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Conceptual system maps to guide research and management of multiple ecosystem services and disservices

Pablo García‐Díaz, María de Lourdes Gultemirian, Julieta Carilla, Oriana Osinaga Acosta, Guillermo E. Hankel, Sergio J. Ceballos, Miguel Lurgi, Sebastián Albanesi, Alfredo Grau, Ana Denise Fuenzalida, Cecilia Blundo, Ezequiel Aráoz, Priscila Ana Powell, Yohana G. Jiménez, Agustina Malizia, María Gabriela Quintana, Ignácio Gasparri, Giselle Alejandra Rodríguez, Carlos Molineri
article en

Abstract

• Simultaneous modelling of multiple ecosystem services is a pressing but hard task. • Conceptual system maps formalise our understanding of multiple ecosystem services. • Network analyses identify key system drivers for targeted data collection. • Conceptual system maps should be revised regularly to reflect updated knowledge. Integrated assessments of multiple natural capital and ecosystem services and disservices (ESD) are needed to guide research and management in South America. Unfortunately, a poor understanding of the drivers of ESD and a scarcity of data undermine these efforts. Here, we combine expert knowledge and network analyses to create conceptual system maps to support the research and management of multiple ESD. Using the example of the Lules River watershed (northwestern Argentina), we integrated the biotic, abiotic, socio-economic, and policy drivers of five ESD selected due to their relevance to human well-being and biodiversity conservation in the area: (i) aboveground carbon stock; (ii) water quality; (iii) water quantity; (iv) dengue transmission; and (v) leishmaniasis transmission. Through facilitated activities, we encoded expert knowledge into networks representing drivers and causal interactions between those drivers. We recorded 43 drivers, of which 18 were identified as key drivers based on network metrics. The majority of key drivers were abiotic and socio-economic drivers (38.9% and 33.3% of 18, respectively), and we found potential information sources for all of these key drivers. Conceptual system maps provided significant benefits for guiding ESD research and ecosystem-based management. First, they formalised our current understanding of the system and provided a model that can be updated with new information. Second, they can be analysed through established network metrics to uncover relationships critical to effective system-level management and identify key drivers for data-gathering efforts. These maps offer a rapid and interdisciplinary tool to overcome existing barriers to integrated assessments in data-poor areas and are a powerful method to support system-based approaches to environmental management.

Perspectives in Ecology and ConservationVol. 23(2)
National University of Tucumán (AR), Swansea University (GB), Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan (AR), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (AR), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán (AR), Fundación Miguel Lillo (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.