Emotional freedom techniques in mental health care: evidence review, gaps, and future directions

Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) is an evidence-based, self-help, and cost-effective therapy used by millions worldwide since its development in the 1980s. It integrates energy psychology, acupressure, exposure therapy, and cognitive-behavioral elements to treat various psychological and medical conditions. Like other fourth-wave or mind–body therapies incorporating somatic components, such as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMRD), EFT has gained popularity among practitioners in the last two decades for the treatment of somatic symptoms of stress, anxiety, depression, childhood trauma, and adult survivors and caregivers during natural and human-made disasters, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite over 100 published studies reporting its efficacy, EFT has historically been controversial and, to date, has faced opposition to its adoption by the scientific community in clinical settings for various reasons, including concerns about its efficacy, alleged rapidity, and questioned mechanisms. This inconsistency in the literature creates gaps in conceptual, theoretical, empirical, methodological, and practical bases. This review addresses these gaps by providing a critical and balanced overview of current EFT research from a scientist–practitioner perspective. PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases were used to search the literature. Findings outline EFT’s emerging concepts, recent developments, and latest criticisms. Conclusions propose a potential research agenda and future practical applications of EFT within the current global mental health crisis (GMHC) context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Mental Health and Well-Being
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/mhealthwellb7723
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional freedom techniques in mental health care: evidence review, gaps, and future directions

Sebastian Salicru
1 citations
Academia Mental Health and Well-Being
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
1.47
article

Emotional freedom techniques in mental health care: evidence review, gaps, and future directions

Sebastian Salicru
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) is an evidence-based, self-help, and cost-effective therapy used by millions worldwide since its development in the 1980s. It integrates energy psychology, acupressure, exposure therapy, and cognitive-behavioral elements to treat various psychological and medical conditions. Like other fourth-wave or mind–body therapies incorporating somatic components, such as eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMRD), EFT has gained popularity among practitioners in the last two decades for the treatment of somatic symptoms of stress, anxiety, depression, childhood trauma, and adult survivors and caregivers during natural and human-made disasters, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite over 100 published studies reporting its efficacy, EFT has historically been controversial and, to date, has faced opposition to its adoption by the scientific community in clinical settings for various reasons, including concerns about its efficacy, alleged rapidity, and questioned mechanisms. This inconsistency in the literature creates gaps in conceptual, theoretical, empirical, methodological, and practical bases. This review addresses these gaps by providing a critical and balanced overview of current EFT research from a scientist–practitioner perspective. PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases were used to search the literature. Findings outline EFT’s emerging concepts, recent developments, and latest criticisms. Conclusions propose a potential research agenda and future practical applications of EFT within the current global mental health crisis (GMHC) context.

Academia Mental Health and Well-BeingVol. 2(2)
Hospital Sant Pau i Santa Tecla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Emotional freedom techniques in mental health care: evidence review, gaps, and future directions — Sebastian Salicru · Academia Mental Health and Well-Being (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS