‘Of course we make money, but it has to be in a responsible way’: safer gambling practices reported by state-owned gambling operators

Background<br/>Gambling can be regulated in different ways, with some jurisdictions having competitive markets of privately-owned operators, some jurisdictions having state-owned operators that have exclusive legal monopolies, and in other jurisdictions former state-owned monopolies now compete in markets against privately-owned operators. While privately-owned operators tend to emphasize gamblers’ individual responsibility while implementing suboptimal voluntary harm-prevention measures, less is known about the safer gambling practices of state-owned gambling operators, a topic which we aim to contribute to here.<br/><br/>Method<br/>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants employed in safer gambling roles at state-owned gambling operators in 10 jurisdictions, with transcripts then subjected to thematic and discourse-based analyses.<br/><br/>Results<br/>Participants constructed distinctive identities for their organizations. State-owned operators were portrayed as being uniquely capable of balancing profit with consumer protection, of building consumer trust, and in pioneering in harm reduction. The safer gambling practices of privately owned operators were described as ‘performative’, whereas state-owned operators emphasized a more ‘authentic’ approach. This included making safer gambling tools accessible, proactively contacting customers experiencing harm, and implementing operator-driven limits based on risk profiles. When discussing competitive market dynamics, participants challenged dominant narratives about illegal gambling markets. Participants criticized excessive marketing practices by private operators and advocated for system-wide approaches to harm prevention rather than fragmented ones.<br/><br/>Conclusions<br/>The perspectives from state-owned gambling operators should be integrated into new harm-prevention approaches for today’s online and interconnected gambling world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addiction Research & Theory
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2025.2507776
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Of course we make money, but it has to be in a responsible way’: safer gambling practices reported by state-owned gambling operators

Philip Newall, Jamie Torrance, Allegra Katharine Whybrow
1 citations
Addiction Research & Theory
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
2.31
article

‘Of course we make money, but it has to be in a responsible way’: safer gambling practices reported by state-owned gambling operators

Philip Newall, Jamie Torrance, Allegra Katharine Whybrow
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background<br/>Gambling can be regulated in different ways, with some jurisdictions having competitive markets of privately-owned operators, some jurisdictions having state-owned operators that have exclusive legal monopolies, and in other jurisdictions former state-owned monopolies now compete in markets against privately-owned operators. While privately-owned operators tend to emphasize gamblers’ individual responsibility while implementing suboptimal voluntary harm-prevention measures, less is known about the safer gambling practices of state-owned gambling operators, a topic which we aim to contribute to here.<br/><br/>Method<br/>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants employed in safer gambling roles at state-owned gambling operators in 10 jurisdictions, with transcripts then subjected to thematic and discourse-based analyses.<br/><br/>Results<br/>Participants constructed distinctive identities for their organizations. State-owned operators were portrayed as being uniquely capable of balancing profit with consumer protection, of building consumer trust, and in pioneering in harm reduction. The safer gambling practices of privately owned operators were described as ‘performative’, whereas state-owned operators emphasized a more ‘authentic’ approach. This included making safer gambling tools accessible, proactively contacting customers experiencing harm, and implementing operator-driven limits based on risk profiles. When discussing competitive market dynamics, participants challenged dominant narratives about illegal gambling markets. Participants criticized excessive marketing practices by private operators and advocated for system-wide approaches to harm prevention rather than fragmented ones.<br/><br/>Conclusions<br/>The perspectives from state-owned gambling operators should be integrated into new harm-prevention approaches for today’s online and interconnected gambling world.

Addiction Research & TheoryVol. 34(1)
University of Bristol (GB), Swansea University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.