Motivation to engage in counterproductive work behaviour: an expectancy theory analysis

Purpose Counterproductive work behaviours (CWB) are varied and have multiple potential causes. Using a recently developed expectancy theory based CWB scale and self-reported engagement in CWB, this study aims to explore how expectancies surrounding the potential benefits and costs of engaging in CWB relate to the performance of these behaviours. Design/methodology/approach This study used a cross-sectional self-report method to assess self-reported CWB, individual and situational variables relevant to CWB and a detailed expectancy theory-based assessment to assess motivations to commit CWB. Findings The findings identified a lack of perceived likelihood of being caught acting as the most influential factor behind CWB engagement. Among the situational and personality variables investigated, organisational constraints, self-control and conscientiousness most strongly correlated with self-reported CWB. In addition, analyses demonstrated that personality and situation variables have direct relationships with expectancy theory components. Originality/value This study is the first to make a detailed examination of the motivation to commit CWB and to investigate how individual and situational variables relate to each aspect of motivation to commit CWB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of organizational analysis
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-11-2024-4977
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motivation to engage in counterproductive work behaviour: an expectancy theory analysis

Adam W. Meade, S. Bartholomew Craig, Quintin Kidder
International journal of organizational analysis
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Motivation to engage in counterproductive work behaviour: an expectancy theory analysis

Adam W. Meade, S. Bartholomew Craig, Quintin Kidder
article en

Abstract

Purpose Counterproductive work behaviours (CWB) are varied and have multiple potential causes. Using a recently developed expectancy theory based CWB scale and self-reported engagement in CWB, this study aims to explore how expectancies surrounding the potential benefits and costs of engaging in CWB relate to the performance of these behaviours. Design/methodology/approach This study used a cross-sectional self-report method to assess self-reported CWB, individual and situational variables relevant to CWB and a detailed expectancy theory-based assessment to assess motivations to commit CWB. Findings The findings identified a lack of perceived likelihood of being caught acting as the most influential factor behind CWB engagement. Among the situational and personality variables investigated, organisational constraints, self-control and conscientiousness most strongly correlated with self-reported CWB. In addition, analyses demonstrated that personality and situation variables have direct relationships with expectancy theory components. Originality/value This study is the first to make a detailed examination of the motivation to commit CWB and to investigate how individual and situational variables relate to each aspect of motivation to commit CWB.

International journal of organizational analysisVol. 34(3)
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Motivation to engage in counterproductive work behaviour: an expectancy theory analysis — Adam W. Meade, S. Bartholomew Craig, et al. · International journal of organizational analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS