Application of Biological Modifiers to a Multiplexed, Human Cell‐Based <scp>DNA</scp> Damage Assay Provides Mechanistic Information on Genotoxicity and Molecular Targets

This laboratory has reported that the combined use of In Vitro MicroFlow and MultiFlow assays provides information regarding chemicals' genotoxic mode of action (MoA). In an effort to go beyond MoA assessments, we incorporated a panel of biological response modifiers that elicit specific effects on the assays' biomarker response profiles. This was done to pursue our hypothesis that such perturbation signatures would reveal information on clastogenic mechanisms and molecular targets. For this proof-of-concept study, we exposed TK6 cells to 20 known clastogens. Cells were exposed in 96-well plates in the presence and absence of each of four modifying agents at one optimized concentration: talazoparib (PARP inhibitor), MK-8776 (CHK1 inhibitor), AZD-7648 (DNA-PK inhibitor), or a cocktail of reactive oxygen species scavengers. In parallel, cells were also exposed to each of the test chemicals for 4 h, at which time cells were washed and allowed to recover for an additional 20 h. For each of these treatment conditions, sample processing and flow cytometric analyses were performed using standard In Vitro MicroFlow and MultiFlow procedures to measure micronuclei, γH2AX, phosphohistone-H3 (p-H3), p53 activation, and relative nuclei counts. The resulting biomarker response data were processed with PROAST benchmark dose (BMD) software, with modifying agent as a covariate. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the collective potency metrics for various combinations of biomarkers showed that clastogens with similar genotoxic mechanisms grouped together. Overall, this study shows that in combination with biological response modifiers, MultiFlow and In Vitro MicroFlow biomarkers can provide mechanistic insights into chemical-induced genotoxicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/em.70017
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Biological Modifiers to a Multiplexed, Human Cell‐Based DNA Damage Assay Provides Mechanistic Information on Genotoxicity and Molecular Targets

Jeffrey C. Bemis, Stephen D. Dertinger, Nikki E. Hall, Erica M. Briggs et al.
Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Application of Biological Modifiers to a Multiplexed, Human Cell‐Based DNA Damage Assay Provides Mechanistic Information on Genotoxicity and Molecular Targets

Jeffrey C. Bemis, Stephen D. Dertinger, Nikki E. Hall, Erica M. Briggs, Steven M. Bryce, Kyle Tichenor, Svetlana L. Avlasevich, Adam Conrad
article en

Abstract

This laboratory has reported that the combined use of In Vitro MicroFlow and MultiFlow assays provides information regarding chemicals' genotoxic mode of action (MoA). In an effort to go beyond MoA assessments, we incorporated a panel of biological response modifiers that elicit specific effects on the assays' biomarker response profiles. This was done to pursue our hypothesis that such perturbation signatures would reveal information on clastogenic mechanisms and molecular targets. For this proof-of-concept study, we exposed TK6 cells to 20 known clastogens. Cells were exposed in 96-well plates in the presence and absence of each of four modifying agents at one optimized concentration: talazoparib (PARP inhibitor), MK-8776 (CHK1 inhibitor), AZD-7648 (DNA-PK inhibitor), or a cocktail of reactive oxygen species scavengers. In parallel, cells were also exposed to each of the test chemicals for 4 h, at which time cells were washed and allowed to recover for an additional 20 h. For each of these treatment conditions, sample processing and flow cytometric analyses were performed using standard In Vitro MicroFlow and MultiFlow procedures to measure micronuclei, γH2AX, phosphohistone-H3 (p-H3), p53 activation, and relative nuclei counts. The resulting biomarker response data were processed with PROAST benchmark dose (BMD) software, with modifying agent as a covariate. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the collective potency metrics for various combinations of biomarkers showed that clastogens with similar genotoxic mechanisms grouped together. Overall, this study shows that in combination with biological response modifiers, MultiFlow and In Vitro MicroFlow biomarkers can provide mechanistic insights into chemical-induced genotoxicity.

Environmental and Molecular MutagenesisVol. 66(5)
Litron Laboratories (United States) (US)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.