Enhancing Leadership and Decision-Making in Engineering Education: A Strategic Approach to Faculty and Institutional Management

This study explores strategic approaches to leadership and decision-making within engineering education institutions, focusing on how these practices influence faculty management and institutional performance. Using a qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic leaders, department heads, and senior faculty members across three engineering institutions in the Philippines. Findings revealed five key themes: participatory leadership, evidence-informed decision-making, collaborative culture, strategic alignment, and leadership development pathways. The research highlights the importance of inclusive leadership models, ongoing professional development, and data-driven strategies in enhancing academic outcomes and institutional resilience. As Bass and Riggio (2006) argue, transformational leadership is central to driving innovation and motivation in complex academic environments. Moreover, Kezar and Eckel (2004) emphasize that leadership in higher education must be adaptive, strategic, and collaborative to respond effectively to institutional challenges.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may691
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Leadership and Decision-Making in Engineering Education: A Strategic Approach to Faculty and Institutional Management

Noel T. Florencondia, Ailene Q. Supian
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Enhancing Leadership and Decision-Making in Engineering Education: A Strategic Approach to Faculty and Institutional Management

Noel T. Florencondia, Ailene Q. Supian
article en

Abstract

This study explores strategic approaches to leadership and decision-making within engineering education institutions, focusing on how these practices influence faculty management and institutional performance. Using a qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic leaders, department heads, and senior faculty members across three engineering institutions in the Philippines. Findings revealed five key themes: participatory leadership, evidence-informed decision-making, collaborative culture, strategic alignment, and leadership development pathways. The research highlights the importance of inclusive leadership models, ongoing professional development, and data-driven strategies in enhancing academic outcomes and institutional resilience. As Bass and Riggio (2006) argue, transformational leadership is central to driving innovation and motivation in complex academic environments. Moreover, Kezar and Eckel (2004) emphasize that leadership in higher education must be adaptive, strategic, and collaborative to respond effectively to institutional challenges.

Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Leadership and Decision-Making in Engineering Education: A Strategic Approach to Faculty and Institutional Management — Noel T. Florencondia, Ailene Q. Supian · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS