Pipe Dreams: Imagining Different Futures for Canada in the 1970s

This article examines the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry (1974–7) for what it reveals of Canada’s 1970s. Led by Justice Thomas R. Berger, the inquiry assessed the regional impacts of a proposed natural gas pipeline across the northern Yukon and Mackenzie Valley in the Northwest Territories. However, it also provoked a broader debate about what Canada should be, revealing deep divisions over development, democracy, and progress. I explore how different public interest organizations and Indigenous peoples used the inquiry to offer critiques about the closed nature of decision-making, the limits to growth, and the impacts of colonialism. These critiques were the basis of different imagined futures for Canada, ones with varying paths for development and societal progress that still had a role – albeit a reimagined one – for government.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Historical Review
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/chr-2024-0065
Primary Topic
Canadian Identity and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pipe Dreams: Imagining Different Futures for Canada in the 1970s

Tina Loo
Canadian Historical Review
Canadian Identity and History
article

Pipe Dreams: Imagining Different Futures for Canada in the 1970s

Tina Loo
article en

Abstract

This article examines the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry (1974–7) for what it reveals of Canada’s 1970s. Led by Justice Thomas R. Berger, the inquiry assessed the regional impacts of a proposed natural gas pipeline across the northern Yukon and Mackenzie Valley in the Northwest Territories. However, it also provoked a broader debate about what Canada should be, revealing deep divisions over development, democracy, and progress. I explore how different public interest organizations and Indigenous peoples used the inquiry to offer critiques about the closed nature of decision-making, the limits to growth, and the impacts of colonialism. These critiques were the basis of different imagined futures for Canada, ones with varying paths for development and societal progress that still had a role – albeit a reimagined one – for government.

Canadian Historical ReviewVol. 106(2)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Canadian Identity and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pipe Dreams: Imagining Different Futures for Canada in the 1970s — Tina Loo · Canadian Historical Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS