Use of quantitative PCR to detect and differentiate earthworm species

Earthworms are a key component of the soil biology, their abundance and ecological diversity can be used to assess soil biological health. Current assessment of earthworms involves manual hand-sorting individuals from soil before identification. While molecular techniques have been used to describe earthworm diversity, they have not been used to assess earthworm abundance. This study investigates the use of molecular techniques to describe both earthworm abundance and diversity. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to identify the DNA of common pasture earthworms, representing the different ecological groups (e.g. Lumbricus rubellus as epigeic, Aporrectodea caliginosa as endogeic and Aporrectodea longa as anecic). The primers and probes used could specifically identify target earthworm species. The qPCR cycle quantification threshold (Cq) results from dried soil (38 °C) showed improved detection efficiency and stability in comparison to fresh soil. A significant relationship was observed between A. caliginosa Cq value and abundance determined by traditional assessment from soil collected from 129 transects on pasture soils. This study validated the ability of molecular techniques to define earthworm abundance and diversity that will enable the routine assessment of earthworms as biological indicators of soil health. • The abundance of Aporrectodea caliginosa was correlated to qPCR results. • Other earthworm species were also able to be detected from eDNA using qPCR. • The qPCR method was effective using dried soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Soil Ecology
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106208
Primary Topic
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of quantitative PCR to detect and differentiate earthworm species

Nicole L. Schon, REBECCA J. HILL, Pei-Chun Hsu, Sara M. Loeffen et al.
Applied Soil Ecology
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
article

Use of quantitative PCR to detect and differentiate earthworm species

Nicole L. Schon, REBECCA J. HILL, Pei-Chun Hsu, Sara M. Loeffen, Kyle Devey
article en

Abstract

Earthworms are a key component of the soil biology, their abundance and ecological diversity can be used to assess soil biological health. Current assessment of earthworms involves manual hand-sorting individuals from soil before identification. While molecular techniques have been used to describe earthworm diversity, they have not been used to assess earthworm abundance. This study investigates the use of molecular techniques to describe both earthworm abundance and diversity. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to identify the DNA of common pasture earthworms, representing the different ecological groups (e.g. Lumbricus rubellus as epigeic, Aporrectodea caliginosa as endogeic and Aporrectodea longa as anecic). The primers and probes used could specifically identify target earthworm species. The qPCR cycle quantification threshold (Cq) results from dried soil (38 °C) showed improved detection efficiency and stability in comparison to fresh soil. A significant relationship was observed between A. caliginosa Cq value and abundance determined by traditional assessment from soil collected from 129 transects on pasture soils. This study validated the ability of molecular techniques to define earthworm abundance and diversity that will enable the routine assessment of earthworms as biological indicators of soil health. • The abundance of Aporrectodea caliginosa was correlated to qPCR results. • Other earthworm species were also able to be detected from eDNA using qPCR. • The qPCR method was effective using dried soils.

Applied Soil EcologyVol. 212
Livestock Improvement Corporation (NZ), AgResearch (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.