Nineteenth-Century Objects: Review of Marta Caraion, <i>Comment la littérature pense les objets. Théorie littéraire de la culture matérielle</i>

ABSTRACT Caraion’s work examines the treatment of objects in French literature from 1850 to 1900, arguing that this period uniquely explores the multifaceted roles of material things. Rather than limiting objects to the role of symbols for abstract ideas—as seen in romanticism where objects represent emotions or universal themes—narratives of this period pay increased attention to the materiality of objects and to their role in shaping human experience. Dividing her study into two parts, Caraion contrasts unique, often artistic objects with serially produced ones, and then explores how objects evoke memories and contribute to a sense of identity. Through examples drawn from writers like Chateaubriand, Balzac, Zola, Maupassant, and Jules Verne, she demonstrates that literature functioned as “the theoretical laboratory where a critical thinking about objects is formulated,” long before the contemporary movement of New Materialism took up this question, and she lays down the foundations for a diachronic study of objects in fiction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Style
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/style.59.1.0114
Primary Topic
Visual Culture and Art Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nineteenth-Century Objects: Review of Marta Caraion, Comment la littérature pense les objets. Théorie littéraire de la culture matérielle

Marie‐Laure Ryan
Style
Visual Culture and Art Theory
article

Nineteenth-Century Objects: Review of Marta Caraion, Comment la littérature pense les objets. Théorie littéraire de la culture matérielle

Marie‐Laure Ryan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Caraion’s work examines the treatment of objects in French literature from 1850 to 1900, arguing that this period uniquely explores the multifaceted roles of material things. Rather than limiting objects to the role of symbols for abstract ideas—as seen in romanticism where objects represent emotions or universal themes—narratives of this period pay increased attention to the materiality of objects and to their role in shaping human experience. Dividing her study into two parts, Caraion contrasts unique, often artistic objects with serially produced ones, and then explores how objects evoke memories and contribute to a sense of identity. Through examples drawn from writers like Chateaubriand, Balzac, Zola, Maupassant, and Jules Verne, she demonstrates that literature functioned as “the theoretical laboratory where a critical thinking about objects is formulated,” long before the contemporary movement of New Materialism took up this question, and she lays down the foundations for a diachronic study of objects in fiction.

StyleVol. 59(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Visual Culture and Art Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nineteenth-Century Objects: Review of Marta Caraion, <i>Comment la littérature pense les objets. Théorie littéraire de la culture matérielle</i> — Marie‐Laure Ryan · Style (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS