Environmental Risks and Toxicity of Fipronil and Imidacloprid Used in Pets Ectoparasiticides

Fipronil (FIP) and imidacloprid (IMID) are two of the most commonly used ectoparasiticides to control parasites in pets. Compared with those of farm animals, their environmental risks have generally been considered low because of their limited use; however, the growing pet population and evolving treatment practices make this assumption challenging. To assess these risks, water samples were collected at an animal shelter in Italy to monitor the abundance of ectoparasiticides in aquatic environments. Additionally, laboratory-based ecotoxicological assays were carried out on a range of marine non-target species across different trophic levels (algae, copepods, and mussels). In vitro toxicity tests on human epithelial cell cultures were also implemented to examine potential cytotoxic effects at the levels of human exposure detectable in a domestic setting after pet treatment. Wastewater samples from the shelter contained 0.18 µg L<sup>-1</sup> of IMID, 0.50 µg L<sup>-1</sup> of FIP, and 0.20 µg L<sup>-1</sup> of FIP-sulfone, with these concentrations remaining stable for 60 days. Chronic exposure to FIP and IMID at 30.0 µg L<sup>-1</sup> impaired the mobility of the copepods. The EC<sub>10</sub> and EC<sub>20</sub> values were determined to be 1.7 (0.06-6.59) µg L<sup>-1</sup> and 2.8 (0.436-8.51) µg L<sup>-1</sup> for FIP and 2.6 (0.80-6.33) µg L<sup>-1</sup> and 7.6 (3.12-15.8) µg L<sup>-1</sup> for IMID, respectively. FIP and IMID exposure led to lipid peroxidation in the digestive glands and gills of mussels, whereas only IMID exposure increased acetylcholinesterase activity in the digestive glands at concentrations between 0.5 and 5.0 µg L<sup>-1</sup>. Additionally, both fipronil and imidacloprid triggered the production of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation and decreased the viability of human keratinocyte cells in a concentration-dependent manner. These findings highlight the persistence and potential risks of FIP and IMID, stressing the need for stricter regulations and further research on chronic environmental exposure to safeguard ecosystems and public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111533
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Risks and Toxicity of Fipronil and Imidacloprid Used in Pets Ectoparasiticides

Ines Lacchetti, Marzia Vasarri, Mario Carere, Valentina Meucci et al.
3 citations
Animals
Insect and Pesticide Research
5.02
article

Environmental Risks and Toxicity of Fipronil and Imidacloprid Used in Pets Ectoparasiticides

Ines Lacchetti, Marzia Vasarri, Mario Carere, Valentina Meucci, Lucia De Marchi, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Matteo Oliva, Luca Maria Chiesa, Carlo Pretti, Donatella Degl’Innocenti, Luigi Intorre, Maria Nobile, Laura Mancini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Fipronil (FIP) and imidacloprid (IMID) are two of the most commonly used ectoparasiticides to control parasites in pets. Compared with those of farm animals, their environmental risks have generally been considered low because of their limited use; however, the growing pet population and evolving treatment practices make this assumption challenging. To assess these risks, water samples were collected at an animal shelter in Italy to monitor the abundance of ectoparasiticides in aquatic environments. Additionally, laboratory-based ecotoxicological assays were carried out on a range of marine non-target species across different trophic levels (algae, copepods, and mussels). In vitro toxicity tests on human epithelial cell cultures were also implemented to examine potential cytotoxic effects at the levels of human exposure detectable in a domestic setting after pet treatment. Wastewater samples from the shelter contained 0.18 µg L<sup>-1</sup> of IMID, 0.50 µg L<sup>-1</sup> of FIP, and 0.20 µg L<sup>-1</sup> of FIP-sulfone, with these concentrations remaining stable for 60 days. Chronic exposure to FIP and IMID at 30.0 µg L<sup>-1</sup> impaired the mobility of the copepods. The EC<sub>10</sub> and EC<sub>20</sub> values were determined to be 1.7 (0.06-6.59) µg L<sup>-1</sup> and 2.8 (0.436-8.51) µg L<sup>-1</sup> for FIP and 2.6 (0.80-6.33) µg L<sup>-1</sup> and 7.6 (3.12-15.8) µg L<sup>-1</sup> for IMID, respectively. FIP and IMID exposure led to lipid peroxidation in the digestive glands and gills of mussels, whereas only IMID exposure increased acetylcholinesterase activity in the digestive glands at concentrations between 0.5 and 5.0 µg L<sup>-1</sup>. Additionally, both fipronil and imidacloprid triggered the production of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation and decreased the viability of human keratinocyte cells in a concentration-dependent manner. These findings highlight the persistence and potential risks of FIP and IMID, stressing the need for stricter regulations and further research on chronic environmental exposure to safeguard ecosystems and public health.

AnimalsVol. 15(11)
University of Pisa (IT), University of Milan (IT), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Consorzio per il Centro Interuniversitario di Biologia Marina ed Ecologia Applicata G. Bacci (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Insect and Pesticide Research
5.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.