Cardiovascular Safety Profile of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma: FAERS Data Through a Retrospective Disproportionality Analysis (2014–2023)

<b>Introduction:</b> The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) has significantly improved survival in melanoma patients with BRAF V600 mutations. However, these agents can cause cardiovascular (CV) toxicity, compromising efficacy. This study evaluated the CV adverse events (cAEs) associated with BRAF/MEKi using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify new signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs). <b>Methods:</b> Descriptive and disproportionality analyses were conducted on reports listing dabrafenib (D), vemurafenib (V), encorafenib (E), trametinib (T), cobimetinib (C), or binimetinib (B) as suspects in monotherapy or combination therapy (D + T, V + C, E + B), with melanoma as the indication and at least one cAE. Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) related to cAEs, including bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias, cardiac failure, cardiomyopathy, thrombotic events, ischaemic heart disease, and myocarditis/pericarditis, were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Of the 14,077,067 reports retrieved, 18,370 (0.1%) were linked to BRAF/MEKi, with 1591 (8.7%) reporting cAEs, primarily in combination therapy (<i>n</i> = 1268). Disproportionality analysis identified 64 clinically relevant SDRs, most of which were unexpected. Notable findings included bradyarrhythmias, such as QT prolongation with D + T (<i>n</i> = 59; Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR = 5.09, 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 3.94-6.58), cardiac failure with V + C (29; 3.76, 2.6-5.42), and tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation with D + T (99; 2.37, 1.94-2.89). Among embolic and thrombotic events, clinically significant SDRs were observed for disseminated intravascular coagulation with D + T (38; 10.22, 7.42-14.06) and pulmonary embolism with V + C (22; 2.79, 1.83-4.24). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive CV monitoring in patients receiving BRAF/MEKi therapy to prevent or detect cAEs early and reduce treatment-related risks, particularly in high-risk populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111755
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiovascular Safety Profile of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma: FAERS Data Through a Retrospective Disproportionality Analysis (2014–2023)

Concetta Zito, Edoardo Spina, Mariacarmela Santarpía, María Antonietta Barbieri et al.
2 citations
Cancers
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
1.61
article

Cardiovascular Safety Profile of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma: FAERS Data Through a Retrospective Disproportionality Analysis (2014–2023)

Concetta Zito, Edoardo Spina, Mariacarmela Santarpía, María Antonietta Barbieri, Nicola Silvestris, Giuseppe Cicala, Giulia Russo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) has significantly improved survival in melanoma patients with BRAF V600 mutations. However, these agents can cause cardiovascular (CV) toxicity, compromising efficacy. This study evaluated the CV adverse events (cAEs) associated with BRAF/MEKi using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify new signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs). <b>Methods:</b> Descriptive and disproportionality analyses were conducted on reports listing dabrafenib (D), vemurafenib (V), encorafenib (E), trametinib (T), cobimetinib (C), or binimetinib (B) as suspects in monotherapy or combination therapy (D + T, V + C, E + B), with melanoma as the indication and at least one cAE. Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) related to cAEs, including bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias, cardiac failure, cardiomyopathy, thrombotic events, ischaemic heart disease, and myocarditis/pericarditis, were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Of the 14,077,067 reports retrieved, 18,370 (0.1%) were linked to BRAF/MEKi, with 1591 (8.7%) reporting cAEs, primarily in combination therapy (<i>n</i> = 1268). Disproportionality analysis identified 64 clinically relevant SDRs, most of which were unexpected. Notable findings included bradyarrhythmias, such as QT prolongation with D + T (<i>n</i> = 59; Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR = 5.09, 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 3.94-6.58), cardiac failure with V + C (29; 3.76, 2.6-5.42), and tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation with D + T (99; 2.37, 1.94-2.89). Among embolic and thrombotic events, clinically significant SDRs were observed for disseminated intravascular coagulation with D + T (38; 10.22, 7.42-14.06) and pulmonary embolism with V + C (22; 2.79, 1.83-4.24). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive CV monitoring in patients receiving BRAF/MEKi therapy to prevent or detect cAEs early and reduce treatment-related risks, particularly in high-risk populations.

CancersVol. 17(11)
University of Messina (IT), Istituto Tumori Bari (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.