Dynamic Monitoring of Ecological Environmental Quality in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: Disparities Among Central Asian Countries and Analysis of Key Driving Factors

The ecological environment of arid and semi-arid regions (ASARs) faces significant challenges, highlighting the need for a robust indicator system to assess ecological environmental quality (EEQ) and sustainability. This study investigates Central Asia (CA) using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) to develop a new remote sensing-based ecological index (ASAEI), assessing EEQ from 2000 to 2022 using the CatBoost–SHAP model. The results reveal a distinct spatial pattern in the ASAEI: the southwestern and southeastern regions face more severe ecological challenges, while the northern and central-southern areas exhibit better ecological conditions. The ASAEI exhibits a strong spatial autocorrelation, with high-value clusters in the northern and central-southern regions, where vegetation is dense, and low-value clusters in the southwestern and southeastern desert and Gobi regions. Over time, we observed that ecological degradation shifts from west to east. Overall, ecological restoration in CA exceeds the extent of degradation. Notably, Kazakhstan is primarily experiencing degradation, while other subregions predominantly show signs of restoration. Our analysis indicates that climate conditions and land use types are the primary factors influencing changes in the ASAEI. Furthermore, we project that 54.5% of the CA region will exhibit an improved EEQ, highlighting the need for restoration efforts in the western areas. The ASAEI offers a novel perspective and methodology for assessing EEQ in ASARs, with significant scientific implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17111825
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Biological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Monitoring of Ecological Environmental Quality in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: Disparities Among Central Asian Countries and Analysis of Key Driving Factors

Liya Shi, Jianli Ding, Zhihong Liu, Zihan Zhang et al.
5 citations
Remote Sensing
Agriculture and Biological Studies
24.16
article

Dynamic Monitoring of Ecological Environmental Quality in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: Disparities Among Central Asian Countries and Analysis of Key Driving Factors

Liya Shi, Jianli Ding, Zhihong Liu, Zihan Zhang, Jinming Zhang, Zipeng Zhang, Yue Liu, Jinjie Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The ecological environment of arid and semi-arid regions (ASARs) faces significant challenges, highlighting the need for a robust indicator system to assess ecological environmental quality (EEQ) and sustainability. This study investigates Central Asia (CA) using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) to develop a new remote sensing-based ecological index (ASAEI), assessing EEQ from 2000 to 2022 using the CatBoost–SHAP model. The results reveal a distinct spatial pattern in the ASAEI: the southwestern and southeastern regions face more severe ecological challenges, while the northern and central-southern areas exhibit better ecological conditions. The ASAEI exhibits a strong spatial autocorrelation, with high-value clusters in the northern and central-southern regions, where vegetation is dense, and low-value clusters in the southwestern and southeastern desert and Gobi regions. Over time, we observed that ecological degradation shifts from west to east. Overall, ecological restoration in CA exceeds the extent of degradation. Notably, Kazakhstan is primarily experiencing degradation, while other subregions predominantly show signs of restoration. Our analysis indicates that climate conditions and land use types are the primary factors influencing changes in the ASAEI. Furthermore, we project that 54.5% of the CA region will exhibit an improved EEQ, highlighting the need for restoration efforts in the western areas. The ASAEI offers a novel perspective and methodology for assessing EEQ in ASARs, with significant scientific implications.

Remote SensingVol. 17(11)
Xinjiang Institute of Engineering (CN), Xinjiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture and Biological Studies
24.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.