Detecting Plagiarism in the Age of Generative AI: An Exploratory Experiment

Generative AI agents such as ChatGPT have created renewed concerns about the adverse effects of technology on students’ learning through receiving unpermitted aid in their coursework. We conducted an exploratory experiment involving a typical college course assignment to detect and compare genuine student responses with responses generated by ChatGPT. Using a text classification scheme that we devised, we showed that student responses are fairly accurately distinguishable from AI’s, not only when AI uses its general knowledge to answer questions, but also when it is prompted to use the same material used by students. In addition, we identified elements of authorship style, primarily related to formality, that can help humans set students’ and AI’s work apart. We also explored the strategies that students use and the depth at which they alter AI-generated content to make it “their own”. We found the alterations to be mostly moderate, and the modified text remained mostly detectable by our classification scheme. Overall, our results offer a transparent machine learning model for detecting AI-generated text, stylistic cues that can help humans detect such text, as well as insights into students’ strategies when borrowing content from AI agents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05624
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Plagiarism in the Age of Generative AI: An Exploratory Experiment

Roozmehr Safi
3 citations
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Detecting Plagiarism in the Age of Generative AI: An Exploratory Experiment

Roozmehr Safi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Generative AI agents such as ChatGPT have created renewed concerns about the adverse effects of technology on students’ learning through receiving unpermitted aid in their coursework. We conducted an exploratory experiment involving a typical college course assignment to detect and compare genuine student responses with responses generated by ChatGPT. Using a text classification scheme that we devised, we showed that student responses are fairly accurately distinguishable from AI’s, not only when AI uses its general knowledge to answer questions, but also when it is prompted to use the same material used by students. In addition, we identified elements of authorship style, primarily related to formality, that can help humans set students’ and AI’s work apart. We also explored the strategies that students use and the depth at which they alter AI-generated content to make it “their own”. We found the alterations to be mostly moderate, and the modified text remained mostly detectable by our classification scheme. Overall, our results offer a transparent machine learning model for detecting AI-generated text, stylistic cues that can help humans detect such text, as well as insights into students’ strategies when borrowing content from AI agents.

Communications of the Association for Information SystemsVol. 56
University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.