Using a novel, multi-method approach to evaluate the quality of self-report survey data in organizational readiness research

Our findings suggest that readiness scores can be inflated by low-quality responses, and individual characteristics play a significant role in data quality. There is a need to be aware of who is completing surveys and the context in which surveys are distributed to improve the interpretation of findings and make the measurement of implementation-related constructs more precise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00751-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a novel, multi-method approach to evaluate the quality of self-report survey data in organizational readiness research

Maria McClam, María E. Fernández, Lauren Workman, Derek W. Craig et al.
1 citations
Implementation Science Communications
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

Using a novel, multi-method approach to evaluate the quality of self-report survey data in organizational readiness research

Maria McClam, María E. Fernández, Lauren Workman, Derek W. Craig, Pamela M. Diamond, Andrea Lamont, Timothy J. Walker, Joe R. Padilla, Jocelyn Hunyadi, Abraham Wandersman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our findings suggest that readiness scores can be inflated by low-quality responses, and individual characteristics play a significant role in data quality. There is a need to be aware of who is completing surveys and the context in which surveys are distributed to improve the interpretation of findings and make the measurement of implementation-related constructs more precise.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 6(1)
University of South Carolina (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Cancer Institute
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using a novel, multi-method approach to evaluate the quality of self-report survey data in organizational readiness research — Maria McClam, María E. Fernández, et al. · Implementation Science Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS