CONDITIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF QUALITY DEVELOPMENT – FROM QUALITY 4.0 TO 5.0

Purpose: To present the essence, advantages and threats of Quality 4.0 and Quality 5.0 and to indicate further development directions of quality management concepts.Design/methodology/approach: The research methods used are a thematic review of literature on research on Quality 4.0 and 5.0 and surveys conducted among companies with certified quality management systems in the region of southeastern Poland.Findings: The challenges and drivers of Quality 4.0 development are closely related to Industry 4.0 and are based on IT revolutionizing the business world.The implementation of Quality 4.0 solutions leads to the integrated and intelligent automation of quality standards.The research results show a growing interest in the implementation of Quality 4.0 and TQM 4.0 solutions.The increased focus on social satisfaction through an environmentally sustainable approach has been reflected in Quality 5.0 related to Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0. Research limitations/implications:The main limitations of the conclusions presented in this article and the reflections described by the authors and other researchers include: the study does not offer long-term data on the outcomes of Quality 4.0 and 5.0 implementations, making it difficult to assess their sustained impact; the concepts of Quality 4.0 and 5.0 are still evolving, and the article does not provide universally accepted interpretation.The authors acknowledge a need to develop research on Quality 5.0 in the following directions: investigate the role of organizational culture, leadership styles, and employee training in successfully adopting Quality 4.0 and 5.0; explore how Quality 4.0 and 5.0 can be tailored to specific sectors (e.g., healthcare, education, manufacturing) to address unique challenges and opportunities; examine the balance between automation and human involvement in Quality 5.0, particularly in industries where human judgment and creativity are critical.Originality/value: The article identifies the challenges related to contemporary approaches to pro-quality management of organizations and systematizes the concept of quality in the conditions of Industry 4.0 and 5.0, indicating its key aspects.It is addressed to researchers of quality management issues.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.221.29
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONDITIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF QUALITY DEVELOPMENT – FROM QUALITY 4.0 TO 5.0

Piotr Grudowski, Elżbieta Skrzypek
1 citations
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Digital Transformation in Industry
1.24
article

CONDITIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF QUALITY DEVELOPMENT – FROM QUALITY 4.0 TO 5.0

Piotr Grudowski, Elżbieta Skrzypek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To present the essence, advantages and threats of Quality 4.0 and Quality 5.0 and to indicate further development directions of quality management concepts.Design/methodology/approach: The research methods used are a thematic review of literature on research on Quality 4.0 and 5.0 and surveys conducted among companies with certified quality management systems in the region of southeastern Poland.Findings: The challenges and drivers of Quality 4.0 development are closely related to Industry 4.0 and are based on IT revolutionizing the business world.The implementation of Quality 4.0 solutions leads to the integrated and intelligent automation of quality standards.The research results show a growing interest in the implementation of Quality 4.0 and TQM 4.0 solutions.The increased focus on social satisfaction through an environmentally sustainable approach has been reflected in Quality 5.0 related to Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0. Research limitations/implications:The main limitations of the conclusions presented in this article and the reflections described by the authors and other researchers include: the study does not offer long-term data on the outcomes of Quality 4.0 and 5.0 implementations, making it difficult to assess their sustained impact; the concepts of Quality 4.0 and 5.0 are still evolving, and the article does not provide universally accepted interpretation.The authors acknowledge a need to develop research on Quality 5.0 in the following directions: investigate the role of organizational culture, leadership styles, and employee training in successfully adopting Quality 4.0 and 5.0; explore how Quality 4.0 and 5.0 can be tailored to specific sectors (e.g., healthcare, education, manufacturing) to address unique challenges and opportunities; examine the balance between automation and human involvement in Quality 5.0, particularly in industries where human judgment and creativity are critical.Originality/value: The article identifies the challenges related to contemporary approaches to pro-quality management of organizations and systematizes the concept of quality in the conditions of Industry 4.0 and 5.0, indicating its key aspects.It is addressed to researchers of quality management issues.

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management SeriesVol. 2025(221)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Digital Transformation in Industry
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.