39. Success Vs Failure in Digit Replantation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Post-operative Outcomes

PURPOSE: Digit replantation is a complex procedure with significant potential benefits and risks. While preoperative risk factors are well studied, the long-term consequences of replantation failure remain under-explored. Our study aims to compare the outcomes and complications between successful and failed digit replantations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database. Patients who underwent digit replantation were categorized into two groups: successful replantation and replantation failure. Failure was defined as requiring amputation within 1 month. 30-day post-operative outcomes, including complications, reoperations, and psychological factors, were evaluated from time of replantation in the success group and amputation in the failure group. RESULTS: Of the 1,986 patients who underwent digit replantation after traumatic injury, 1,470 (67%) were successful. Replantation failure was associated with increased risk of infection (3.7% vs. 1.8%, p=0.02), necrosis (14.3% vs. 2.0%, p<0.0001), anesthesia for hand procedures (p<0.0001), debridement (5.6% vs. 2.7%, p=0.004), and nerve block procedures (33.8% vs. 27.5%, p=0.01). Patients with failed replantations were also more likely to experience adjustment disorder (2.7% vs. <1%, p=0.02) compared to successful cases. Patients who had successful replantation were more likely to require opioid analgesia (78.2% vs. 68.1%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients who required amputation of their replanted digit had higher rates of infection, necrosis, reoperation, and psychological distress. Successful replantation increased the likelihood of opioid analgesia use. Careful patient selection and counseling are essential to balance the potential benefits of improved function and quality of life against the risks of complications and psychological distress associated with replantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001114000.40981.27
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

39. Success Vs Failure in Digit Replantation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Post-operative Outcomes

Manuela Gaviria, Braden N. Miller, C. Anton Fries, Roberto Martinez et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

39. Success Vs Failure in Digit Replantation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Post-operative Outcomes

Manuela Gaviria, Braden N. Miller, C. Anton Fries, Roberto Martinez, Natalia Pluta, Augustine J. Deering, Payden Harrah
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Digit replantation is a complex procedure with significant potential benefits and risks. While preoperative risk factors are well studied, the long-term consequences of replantation failure remain under-explored. Our study aims to compare the outcomes and complications between successful and failed digit replantations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database. Patients who underwent digit replantation were categorized into two groups: successful replantation and replantation failure. Failure was defined as requiring amputation within 1 month. 30-day post-operative outcomes, including complications, reoperations, and psychological factors, were evaluated from time of replantation in the success group and amputation in the failure group. RESULTS: Of the 1,986 patients who underwent digit replantation after traumatic injury, 1,470 (67%) were successful. Replantation failure was associated with increased risk of infection (3.7% vs. 1.8%, p=0.02), necrosis (14.3% vs. 2.0%, p<0.0001), anesthesia for hand procedures (p<0.0001), debridement (5.6% vs. 2.7%, p=0.004), and nerve block procedures (33.8% vs. 27.5%, p=0.01). Patients with failed replantations were also more likely to experience adjustment disorder (2.7% vs. <1%, p=0.02) compared to successful cases. Patients who had successful replantation were more likely to require opioid analgesia (78.2% vs. 68.1%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients who required amputation of their replanted digit had higher rates of infection, necrosis, reoperation, and psychological distress. Successful replantation increased the likelihood of opioid analgesia use. Careful patient selection and counseling are essential to balance the potential benefits of improved function and quality of life against the risks of complications and psychological distress associated with replantation.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(S2)
Brooke Army Medical Center (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Joint Base San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.