D10. Systematic Review of Excisional Techniques for the Correction Of Gynecomastia

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of excisional techniques for surgical correction of gynecomastia. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane database of controlled trials for studies evaluating outcomes in gynecomastia surgery. The Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were applied. Included studies were any mastectomy technique for gynecomastia and primary literature. Liposuction-only cases were excluded. RESULTS: 7459 patients in 68 treatment groups from 59 studies were included. Surgical techniques included periareolar (67.6 %, n=5046, 24 studies), inferior pedicle (0.43%, n=32, 3 studies), pull-through (11.1%, n=825, 8 studies), and mixed (20.5%, n=1526, 8 studies) techniques. For all techniques identified, rates of hematoma, seroma, and nipple necrosis were less than 6%, and rates of infection were less than 1%. High rates of dehiscence (17%) were identified in the pull-through cohort. A subset of the periareolar patients (n=251, 10 studies) had periareolar skin excision in a Bunnelli-type or similar incision. This group demonstrated higher rates of dehiscence (6.02%), scarring (8.70%), and nipple necrosis (1.12%). CONCLUSION: Most techniques for gynecomastia demonstrate low complication rates. Higher rates of dehiscence and nipple necrosis in cohorts with periareolar skin excision may be due to increased tension and incision bunching around the nipple-areolar complex.