D72. Matriculants Vs. Unmatched: Differences in Research Quality Among Plastic Surgery Applicants With and Without a Home Program

PURPOSE: Integrated plastic surgery (PS) is one of the most competitive specialties, with a match rate of 58.8% in 2024. Our study aims to draw distinctions in research quality between matched and unmatched applicants. METHODS: Applicants to a single PS residency program in 2023 were studied. Residency webpages were queried to determine match status (M, UM) and home program status (HP, NHP). For each individual, PubMed was indexed for peer-reviewed publications through September 2022. Variables included number of PS-related publications, first-author publications, article type, and h-index. RESULTS: Among 277 applicants meeting inclusion criteria, 208 successfully matriculated in 2023. The sample included 139 M-HP, 44 M-NHP, 48 U-HP, and 46 U-NHP applicants. Most applicants had a home PS program (M: 76%; U: 51%). Matched applicants were 3.03 times more likely to have a home program (95% CI 1.79-5.13) and 2.03 times more likely to have completed a research fellowship (95% CI 1.15-5.36). There were no significant differences in the average number of PubMed-indexed publications, PS-related publications, first-author publications, or h-index. M-HP applicants had significantly more commentary publications than U-HP (p=0.003) and U-NHP (p=0.03) applicants. M-HP applicants also published in journals with higher impact factors than unmatched applicants, though not significantly. CONCLUSION: Matched applicants demonstrated minimal differences in the number of overall publications and PS-related publications, conveying overall research quality is not significantly different between cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001114796.88237.44
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D72. Matriculants Vs. Unmatched: Differences in Research Quality Among Plastic Surgery Applicants With and Without a Home Program

Aditya Gunturi, Max Silverstein, Bhavana Thota, Paige M. Fox et al.
1 citations
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Diversity and Career in Medicine
3.87
article

D72. Matriculants Vs. Unmatched: Differences in Research Quality Among Plastic Surgery Applicants With and Without a Home Program

Aditya Gunturi, Max Silverstein, Bhavana Thota, Paige M. Fox, Nataly Montano Vargas, Christiane How-Volkman, Maheen F. Akhter, Rahim Nazerali, Brian R. Sangalang, Yash A. Mehta, Payton Grande
article en
1 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Integrated plastic surgery (PS) is one of the most competitive specialties, with a match rate of 58.8% in 2024. Our study aims to draw distinctions in research quality between matched and unmatched applicants. METHODS: Applicants to a single PS residency program in 2023 were studied. Residency webpages were queried to determine match status (M, UM) and home program status (HP, NHP). For each individual, PubMed was indexed for peer-reviewed publications through September 2022. Variables included number of PS-related publications, first-author publications, article type, and h-index. RESULTS: Among 277 applicants meeting inclusion criteria, 208 successfully matriculated in 2023. The sample included 139 M-HP, 44 M-NHP, 48 U-HP, and 46 U-NHP applicants. Most applicants had a home PS program (M: 76%; U: 51%). Matched applicants were 3.03 times more likely to have a home program (95% CI 1.79-5.13) and 2.03 times more likely to have completed a research fellowship (95% CI 1.15-5.36). There were no significant differences in the average number of PubMed-indexed publications, PS-related publications, first-author publications, or h-index. M-HP applicants had significantly more commentary publications than U-HP (p=0.003) and U-NHP (p=0.03) applicants. M-HP applicants also published in journals with higher impact factors than unmatched applicants, though not significantly. CONCLUSION: Matched applicants demonstrated minimal differences in the number of overall publications and PS-related publications, conveying overall research quality is not significantly different between cohorts.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(S2)
University of California, Riverside (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), California Northstate University (US), University of Rochester (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.