Disappearing Research: Academic Control and Self-Censorship in China

How does state censorship contribute to self-censorship in Chinese universities? How does self-censorship in turn affect academic output? This article addresses these questions by unveiling the mechanisms of self-censorship and investigating their impact on social science research in and about China. First, we draw on in-depth interviews with scholars and students affiliated with Chinese universities to develop a typology of the mechanisms of self-censorship. Second, we analyze over 5,000 hand-coded publications of scholars based at US and Chinese universities from 1985 to 2022 to determine the consequences of self-censorship for the production of knowledge. The findings reveal which research topics have “disappeared” over time and which have “migrated” from Chinese- to English-language venues, often leading to broader self-censorship outcomes than the regime intended. Additionally, we find that US-based scholars are not immune to these pressures. These findings contribute to scholarship on authoritarianism, (self-)censorship, and academic freedom.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The China Journal
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/735160
Citations
6
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
51.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disappearing Research: Academic Control and Self-Censorship in China

Elizabeth Plantan, Ning Leng
6 citations
The China Journal
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
51.13
article

Disappearing Research: Academic Control and Self-Censorship in China

Elizabeth Plantan, Ning Leng
article en
6 citations

Abstract

How does state censorship contribute to self-censorship in Chinese universities? How does self-censorship in turn affect academic output? This article addresses these questions by unveiling the mechanisms of self-censorship and investigating their impact on social science research in and about China. First, we draw on in-depth interviews with scholars and students affiliated with Chinese universities to develop a typology of the mechanisms of self-censorship. Second, we analyze over 5,000 hand-coded publications of scholars based at US and Chinese universities from 1985 to 2022 to determine the consequences of self-censorship for the production of knowledge. The findings reveal which research topics have “disappeared” over time and which have “migrated” from Chinese- to English-language venues, often leading to broader self-censorship outcomes than the regime intended. Additionally, we find that US-based scholars are not immune to these pressures. These findings contribute to scholarship on authoritarianism, (self-)censorship, and academic freedom.

The China JournalVol. 94
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
51.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.