Wellbore thermal effects during underground hydrogen storage

During the operation of underground hydrogen storage (UHS), the injection and production of hydrogen will alter the temperature of the wellbore and the target storage formation. These temperature changes can potentially affect wellbore materials, and alter reservoir processes such as geochemical and microbial reactions. This study applies standard wellbore heat transport models to calculate the temperature changes induced by the flow of hydrogen and some potential cushion gases: methane, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. These models incorporate the thermal conductivity of wellbore materials, and heat exchange with the surrounding formations, and are solved numerically for a range of flow rates, wellhead temperatures and depths. Two well designs are considered, one with casing only, and the other with injection through tubing, where the annulus is filled with either air or water. An explicit analytical solution is also derived for the simplified case where fluid properties are unchanged with depth, which provides insight into the dependence of the temperature distribution on the input parameters. At a fixed depth, the wellhead temperature and the injection flow rate are found to be the primary factors influencing the bottom hole temperature. At a typical target storage depth of 1500 meters, a wellhead temperature of 15 °C, and low injection rates (e.g. 2 tonnes/day, typical of pilot-scale UHS), the hydrogen at the bottom of the well was < 5 ° C cooler than the storage formation. At higher injection rates ( > 20 tonnes/day, more suitable for commercial UHS), the hydrogen was more than 20 °C cooler than the formation. A well design with an annulus leads to larger cooling effects, especially if the annulus is filled with air. If cushion gas injection is compared for the same bottom-hole pressure difference (rather than the same volumetric rate), then the cooling effects are less than for hydrogen. These wellbore thermal calculations then give the thermal boundary conditions required for non-isothermal reservoir simulations of UHS, which are crucial for assessing feasibility. • Wellbore heat transport models are applied to hydrogen and cushion gases injection. • Hydrogen and cushion gases remain cooler than reservoir at typical storage depths. • Temperature difference between injected gas and formation is sensitive to surface parameters. • Presence of annulus in well design creates an insulating effect. • Air in annulus has higher insulating effect than water.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.435
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wellbore thermal effects during underground hydrogen storage

Jonathan Ennis‐King, Mohammed Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui
2 citations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
0.73
article

Wellbore thermal effects during underground hydrogen storage

Jonathan Ennis‐King, Mohammed Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui
article en
2 citations

Abstract

During the operation of underground hydrogen storage (UHS), the injection and production of hydrogen will alter the temperature of the wellbore and the target storage formation. These temperature changes can potentially affect wellbore materials, and alter reservoir processes such as geochemical and microbial reactions. This study applies standard wellbore heat transport models to calculate the temperature changes induced by the flow of hydrogen and some potential cushion gases: methane, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. These models incorporate the thermal conductivity of wellbore materials, and heat exchange with the surrounding formations, and are solved numerically for a range of flow rates, wellhead temperatures and depths. Two well designs are considered, one with casing only, and the other with injection through tubing, where the annulus is filled with either air or water. An explicit analytical solution is also derived for the simplified case where fluid properties are unchanged with depth, which provides insight into the dependence of the temperature distribution on the input parameters. At a fixed depth, the wellhead temperature and the injection flow rate are found to be the primary factors influencing the bottom hole temperature. At a typical target storage depth of 1500 meters, a wellhead temperature of 15 °C, and low injection rates (e.g. 2 tonnes/day, typical of pilot-scale UHS), the hydrogen at the bottom of the well was < 5 ° C cooler than the storage formation. At higher injection rates ( > 20 tonnes/day, more suitable for commercial UHS), the hydrogen was more than 20 °C cooler than the formation. A well design with an annulus leads to larger cooling effects, especially if the annulus is filled with air. If cushion gas injection is compared for the same bottom-hole pressure difference (rather than the same volumetric rate), then the cooling effects are less than for hydrogen. These wellbore thermal calculations then give the thermal boundary conditions required for non-isothermal reservoir simulations of UHS, which are crucial for assessing feasibility. • Wellbore heat transport models are applied to hydrogen and cushion gases injection. • Hydrogen and cushion gases remain cooler than reservoir at typical storage depths. • Temperature difference between injected gas and formation is sensitive to surface parameters. • Presence of annulus in well design creates an insulating effect. • Air in annulus has higher insulating effect than water.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 139
CSIRO Manufacturing (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.