Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models

This study explores representation biases in simulating political samples using Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on vote choice and public opinion. We evaluate seven LLMs from diverse cultural backgrounds with data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, and Zuobiao Dataset. The study identifies three dimensions of bias: societal and cultural contexts, demographic groups, and political institutions. Results show higher simulation accuracy for vote choice than public opinion, particularly in English-speaking and democratic countries with bipartisan systems. The cultural backgrounds of development teams significantly influence simulation performance. The findings offer insights into addressing biases in AI-driven computational social science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701716.3715591
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models

Weihong Qi, Hanjia Lyu, Jiebo Luo
6 citations
Topic Modeling
14.89
article

Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models

Weihong Qi, Hanjia Lyu, Jiebo Luo
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study explores representation biases in simulating political samples using Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on vote choice and public opinion. We evaluate seven LLMs from diverse cultural backgrounds with data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, and Zuobiao Dataset. The study identifies three dimensions of bias: societal and cultural contexts, demographic groups, and political institutions. Results show higher simulation accuracy for vote choice than public opinion, particularly in English-speaking and democratic countries with bipartisan systems. The cultural backgrounds of development teams significantly influence simulation performance. The findings offer insights into addressing biases in AI-driven computational social science.

Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Rochester (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Topic Modeling
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.