Is the NASA nap the solution for sleep inertia in automated driving? Unveiling effects of deep sleep on driving behavior, vigilance and subjective experience

• With increasing amounts of deep sleep, post-sleep takeover and reaction times are increased and driving speed is decreased. • Deep sleep is associated with low motivation and retarded perception. • Speed components are more affected by deep sleep than accuracy components. • Drivers compensate for decreased cognitive capabilities under sleep inertia. • The NASA nap as a measure to avoid deep sleep is reasonable but not sufficient to avoid sleep inertia. Sleeping during automated driving is likely to become a common future practice. When drivers must resume control due to system boundaries, sleep inertia—post-sleep grogginess and impaired performance—affects their takeover and driving behavior. Research outside of driving indicates that deep sleep (AASM stage N3) can intensify sleep inertia. Operational strategies, like the NASA nap (capping nap duration to 40 min), aim to avoid deep sleep, though effects in driving contexts remain unclear. This study investigated how deep sleep impacts driving behavior, vigilance, and drivers’ subjective states. In a driving simulator study, 20 participants completed two test sessions at different times of the day. Participants slept during an automated drive and drove manually both before and after sleep. Regression analyses assessed changes in driving behavior, vigilance, and subjective states in response to varying amounts of deep sleep. With more deep sleep, takeover times and reaction times to auditory cues increased, and driving speed decreased. Lane keeping and stimuli detection rates were not significantly affected. Participants reported less motivation, delays in perception, discomfort, and struggles to stay awake after increased deep sleep. Findings show that speed-related performance aspects were more affected by deep sleep than accuracy, suggesting drivers compensated for reduced cognitive abilities under sleep inertia. The results support the use of proactive strategies to avoid deep sleep. However, since deep sleep onset occurred rapidly, restricting nap duration might be insufficient to prevent sleep inertia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101472
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the NASA nap the solution for sleep inertia in automated driving? Unveiling effects of deep sleep on driving behavior, vigilance and subjective experience

Markus Tomzig, Martin Baumann, Alexandra Neukum, Christina Kremer et al.
2 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
2.12
article

Is the NASA nap the solution for sleep inertia in automated driving? Unveiling effects of deep sleep on driving behavior, vigilance and subjective experience

Markus Tomzig, Martin Baumann, Alexandra Neukum, Christina Kremer, Johanna Wörle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• With increasing amounts of deep sleep, post-sleep takeover and reaction times are increased and driving speed is decreased. • Deep sleep is associated with low motivation and retarded perception. • Speed components are more affected by deep sleep than accuracy components. • Drivers compensate for decreased cognitive capabilities under sleep inertia. • The NASA nap as a measure to avoid deep sleep is reasonable but not sufficient to avoid sleep inertia. Sleeping during automated driving is likely to become a common future practice. When drivers must resume control due to system boundaries, sleep inertia—post-sleep grogginess and impaired performance—affects their takeover and driving behavior. Research outside of driving indicates that deep sleep (AASM stage N3) can intensify sleep inertia. Operational strategies, like the NASA nap (capping nap duration to 40 min), aim to avoid deep sleep, though effects in driving contexts remain unclear. This study investigated how deep sleep impacts driving behavior, vigilance, and drivers’ subjective states. In a driving simulator study, 20 participants completed two test sessions at different times of the day. Participants slept during an automated drive and drove manually both before and after sleep. Regression analyses assessed changes in driving behavior, vigilance, and subjective states in response to varying amounts of deep sleep. With more deep sleep, takeover times and reaction times to auditory cues increased, and driving speed decreased. Lane keeping and stimuli detection rates were not significantly affected. Participants reported less motivation, delays in perception, discomfort, and struggles to stay awake after increased deep sleep. Findings show that speed-related performance aspects were more affected by deep sleep than accuracy, suggesting drivers compensated for reduced cognitive abilities under sleep inertia. The results support the use of proactive strategies to avoid deep sleep. However, since deep sleep onset occurred rapidly, restricting nap duration might be insufficient to prevent sleep inertia.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 31
Universität Ulm (DE), Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences (Germany) (DE), CREATe Centre (GB), Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.