Crowdsourced Fact-Checking or Biased Commentary? Analyzing Political Bias in Twitter's Community Notes

The rise of social media as a primary source of news has amplified concerns about bias and misinformation, with platforms like Twitter playing a major role in shaping public opinion. Unchecked bias can distort public perception, influence elections, and deepen societal polarization. As traditional fact-checking struggles to keep pace with the flood of online content, crowd-sourced solutions like Twitter's Community Notes offer a promising yet understudied approach to addressing these challenges. This paper provides an exploratory analysis of political bias in Twitter's Community Notes. We analyze 323,382 Community Notes from January 2021 to November 2023, using bias labels based on linked sources. We investigate lexical, sentiment, and temporal features to uncover the bias patterns. Our results show that right-leaning Community Notes have lower readability while left-leaning Notes exhibit more negative sentiment and are more connected to real-world events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701716.3717533
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crowdsourced Fact-Checking or Biased Commentary? Analyzing Political Bias in Twitter's Community Notes

Rajesh Sharma, Roshni Chakraborty, Uku Kangur, Simon Fox Kuuse
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Crowdsourced Fact-Checking or Biased Commentary? Analyzing Political Bias in Twitter's Community Notes

Rajesh Sharma, Roshni Chakraborty, Uku Kangur, Simon Fox Kuuse
article en

Abstract

The rise of social media as a primary source of news has amplified concerns about bias and misinformation, with platforms like Twitter playing a major role in shaping public opinion. Unchecked bias can distort public perception, influence elections, and deepen societal polarization. As traditional fact-checking struggles to keep pace with the flood of online content, crowd-sourced solutions like Twitter's Community Notes offer a promising yet understudied approach to addressing these challenges. This paper provides an exploratory analysis of political bias in Twitter's Community Notes. We analyze 323,382 Community Notes from January 2021 to November 2023, using bias labels based on linked sources. We investigate lexical, sentiment, and temporal features to uncover the bias patterns. Our results show that right-leaning Community Notes have lower readability while left-leaning Notes exhibit more negative sentiment and are more connected to real-world events.

Plaksha University, University of Tartu (EE), Atal Bihari Vajpayee Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management (IN)
Eesti Teadusagentuur, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.