Impact of Derivative Observations on Gaussian Process Machine Learning Potentials: A Direct Comparison of Three Modeling Approaches

Machine learning (ML) potentials have become a well-established tool for providing inexpensive, yet quantum-mechanically accurate, atomistic simulations. Here, we extend our current modeling procedure, based on Gaussian process regression, to include derivative observations into the ML models. We directly compare three system-energy modeling approaches based on quantum mechanically derived quantities: (i) atomic energies, (ii) total system energy, and (iii) total system energy with derivative observations. We find that modeling the total energy with derivative observations has the best performance across the board, achieving chemical accuracy with fewer training data. In addition, both energy and force errors are around an order of magnitude lower when derivative observations are added to the models in some cases. We follow up with a discussion on the multiple advantages the proposed method of modeling brings, such as improved data set availability and the ability to easily include dispersion interactions. Additionally, we discuss the use cases of the new modeling approach in the ML force field FFLUX.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00344
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Derivative Observations on Gaussian Process Machine Learning Potentials: A Direct Comparison of Three Modeling Approaches

Yulian T. Manchev, Paul L. A. Popelier
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Impact of Derivative Observations on Gaussian Process Machine Learning Potentials: A Direct Comparison of Three Modeling Approaches

Yulian T. Manchev, Paul L. A. Popelier
article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) potentials have become a well-established tool for providing inexpensive, yet quantum-mechanically accurate, atomistic simulations. Here, we extend our current modeling procedure, based on Gaussian process regression, to include derivative observations into the ML models. We directly compare three system-energy modeling approaches based on quantum mechanically derived quantities: (i) atomic energies, (ii) total system energy, and (iii) total system energy with derivative observations. We find that modeling the total energy with derivative observations has the best performance across the board, achieving chemical accuracy with fewer training data. In addition, both energy and force errors are around an order of magnitude lower when derivative observations are added to the models in some cases. We follow up with a discussion on the multiple advantages the proposed method of modeling brings, such as improved data set availability and the ability to easily include dispersion interactions. Additionally, we discuss the use cases of the new modeling approach in the ML force field FFLUX.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 21(11)
University of Manchester (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.