Bigger is not always better: The importance of human-scale language modeling for psycholinguistics

When trained to place high probability on a training corpus, neural network language models can learn a surprising amount about language. Recent work has demonstrated that large performance improvements can arise from simply increasing, i.e., scaling, the size of the corpora they are trained on and the number of parameters in those models. Accordingly, many contemporary systems are trained on trillions of words. While largely beneficial to performance on language applications, scaling has several downsides for both computational psycholinguistics and natural language processing research. We discuss the scientific challenges presented by the scaling paradigm, as well as the benefits that would result from language models that can learn from human-scale data. In the second half of this paper, we report on findings from a recent effort to bring about human-scale language model pretraining: the first iteration of the BabyLM Challenge, a shared task organized by the authors that invited participants to train a language model on 100 million words or less. The challenge produced several concrete best practices for practitioners interested in small-scale language modeling. For cognitive scientists, the challenge demonstrated that robust linguistic generalizations can be learned by models trained on a human-scale dataset, though this is not yet achieved through cognitively plausible mechanisms. Furthermore, it established a population of “BabyLMs” that are all effective at data-efficient language learning. Studying such models can help us identify hypotheses for the computational mechanisms that underlie human language acquisition. • Psycholinguistics benefits from computational models trained at human data scale. • We report on the BabyLM Challenge, an effort to train models at human scale. • BabyLM models achieve close to human-level performance on some tasks. • High language modeling performance is attainable with academic computational resources. • We identify actionable insights for human-scale language modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Memory and Language
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2025.104650
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bigger is not always better: The importance of human-scale language modeling for psycholinguistics

Chengxu Zhuang, Ethan Wilcox, Aaron Mueller, Leshem Choshen et al.
2 citations
Journal of Memory and Language
Natural Language Processing Techniques
4.96
article

Bigger is not always better: The importance of human-scale language modeling for psycholinguistics

Chengxu Zhuang, Ethan Wilcox, Aaron Mueller, Leshem Choshen, Michael Y. Hu, Ryan Cotterell, Adina Williams, Tal Linzen, Alex Warstadt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

When trained to place high probability on a training corpus, neural network language models can learn a surprising amount about language. Recent work has demonstrated that large performance improvements can arise from simply increasing, i.e., scaling, the size of the corpora they are trained on and the number of parameters in those models. Accordingly, many contemporary systems are trained on trillions of words. While largely beneficial to performance on language applications, scaling has several downsides for both computational psycholinguistics and natural language processing research. We discuss the scientific challenges presented by the scaling paradigm, as well as the benefits that would result from language models that can learn from human-scale data. In the second half of this paper, we report on findings from a recent effort to bring about human-scale language model pretraining: the first iteration of the BabyLM Challenge, a shared task organized by the authors that invited participants to train a language model on 100 million words or less. The challenge produced several concrete best practices for practitioners interested in small-scale language modeling. For cognitive scientists, the challenge demonstrated that robust linguistic generalizations can be learned by models trained on a human-scale dataset, though this is not yet achieved through cognitively plausible mechanisms. Furthermore, it established a population of “BabyLMs” that are all effective at data-efficient language learning. Studying such models can help us identify hypotheses for the computational mechanisms that underlie human language acquisition. • Psycholinguistics benefits from computational models trained at human data scale. • We report on the BabyLM Challenge, an effort to train models at human scale. • BabyLM models achieve close to human-level performance on some tasks. • High language modeling performance is attainable with academic computational resources. • We identify actionable insights for human-scale language modeling.

Journal of Memory and LanguageVol. 144
Northeastern University (US), Center for Applied Linguistics (US), Georgetown University (US), ETH Zurich (CH), The Metropolitan Opera (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, New York University, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.