“Time is out of Joint”: What is the Future in Futures Studies?

This paper argues that time does not exist as an absolute concept. To do this, it draws on Derrida’s critique of the metaphysics of presence, Einstein and Rovelli’s contributions to physics and also Vedic tradition. Taking a transdisciplinary approach enables an argument against absolute time from multiple, sometimes differing, perspectives. The paper then argues time is like a network- the future already exists, it is present already in the universe. After this, reference is made to how this argument relates to the literature, particularly Inayatullah and Sardar. While the literature may offer a negotiated and relative view of time, it does not necessarily portray it as a network and futures as already existing. To end, the paper suggests that this view does not make Futures Studies irrelevant, instead it provides a new relational framework to view time and temporalities. Overall, a conception of time is a network is suggested and the paper suggests lessons can be taken through a review of some key traditions of thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Futures Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19467567251346438
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Time is out of Joint”: What is the Future in Futures Studies?

Liam Greenacre
World Futures Review
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

“Time is out of Joint”: What is the Future in Futures Studies?

Liam Greenacre
article en

Abstract

This paper argues that time does not exist as an absolute concept. To do this, it draws on Derrida’s critique of the metaphysics of presence, Einstein and Rovelli’s contributions to physics and also Vedic tradition. Taking a transdisciplinary approach enables an argument against absolute time from multiple, sometimes differing, perspectives. The paper then argues time is like a network- the future already exists, it is present already in the universe. After this, reference is made to how this argument relates to the literature, particularly Inayatullah and Sardar. While the literature may offer a negotiated and relative view of time, it does not necessarily portray it as a network and futures as already existing. To end, the paper suggests that this view does not make Futures Studies irrelevant, instead it provides a new relational framework to view time and temporalities. Overall, a conception of time is a network is suggested and the paper suggests lessons can be taken through a review of some key traditions of thinking.

World Futures ReviewVol. 16(4)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.